An analysis of vascular system in the compound tendrilled afila leaf in Pisum sativum.

Recent work on the venation patterning and morphogenesis of leaf/leaflet has posed the question how different are these in tendrils, which are another type of vegetative lateral organ. Here, the venation patterns of leaflets, stipules and tendrils were compared in the model species, P. sativum. Unlike reticulated venation in leaflets and stipules, venation in tendrils comprised of one or more primary veins. A few secondaries were attached to a primary vein, mostly distally. Bilaterally symmetrical secondary veins were rare. The primary veins in tendrils were daughter strands from dichotomously divided mother veins in rachis, connected finally to vascular strands in stem. A tendril received primary vein from one or more mother strands. Some mother strands contributed primary veins to proximal, distal and terminal domain tendrils of af leaf. The tendrils shared the multi-primary vein character with stipules. Vein redundancy provided a mechanism for survival of tendril/leaf against injury to some of the veins/mother veins. The presence of aborted primary veins that did not reach apex, rows of cambium cells attached to primary vein(s) at apex, the pattern of attachment of primary veins to mother veins and cessation of vein growth in apical direction in aborted tendrils of af lld genotype indicated that the growth of primary veins and tendril was acropetal. Loss-of-function of AF extended the repression of TL and MFP genes on leaflet development from distal and apical domains to proximal domain of leaves in af mutants.

[1]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Interaction between cochleata and stipule-reduced mutations results in exstipulate hypertrophied leaves in Pisum sativum L. , 2013, Indian journal of experimental biology.

[2]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Auxin transport inhibitor induced low complexity petiolated leaves and sessile leaf-like stipules and architectures of heritable leaf and stipule mutants in Pisum sativum suggest that its simple lobed stipules and compound leaf represent ancestral forms in angiosperms , 2013, Journal of Genetics.

[3]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Pisum sativum wild-type and mutant stipules and those induced by an auxin transport inhibitor demonstrate the entire diversity of laminated stipules observed in angiosperms , 2013, Protoplasma.

[4]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Stipules are the Principal Photosynthetic Organs in the Papilionoid Species Lathyrus aphaca , 2012 .

[5]  B. Tripathi,et al.  Organ-wise homologies of stipule, leaf and inflorescence between Pisum sativum genetic variants, Delonix regia and Caesalpinia bonduc indicate parallel evolution of morphogenetic regulation , 2012, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[6]  R. Kumari,et al.  Interaction between COCHLEATA and UNIFOLIATA genes enables normal flower morphogenesis in the garden pea, Pisum sativum , 2011, Journal of Genetics.

[7]  R. Kumari,et al.  Genetic control of leaf-blade morphogenesis by the INSECATUS gene in Pisum sativum , 2010, Journal of Genetics.

[8]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Regulation of stipule development by COCHLEATA and STIPULE-REDUCED genes in pea Pisum sativum , 2009, Planta.

[9]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Effects of MULTIFOLIATE-PINNA, AFILA, TENDRIL-LESS and UNIFOLIATA genes on leafblade architecture in Pisum sativum , 2009, Planta.

[10]  K. Mysore,et al.  Control of Compound Leaf Development by FLORICAULA/LEAFY Ortholog SINGLE LEAFLET1 in Medicago truncatula1[C][W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[11]  J. Friml,et al.  Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. , 2006, Genes & development.

[12]  D. Demason,et al.  Roles of Auxin and Uni in Leaf Morphogenesis of the afila Genotype of Pea (Pisum sativum) , 2004, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[13]  E. Scarpella,et al.  Stage-specific markers define early steps of procambium development in Arabidopsis leaves and correlate termination of vein formation with mesophyll differentiation , 2004, Development.

[14]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Interaction of the UNIFOLIATA-TENDRILLED ACACIA gene with AFILA and TENDRIL-LESS genes in the determination of leaf blade growth and morphology in pea Pisum sativum , 2002 .

[15]  J. B. Reid,et al.  Leaf and Flower Development in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): Mutants cochleata andunifoliata , 2001 .

[16]  J. Hofer,et al.  Pea Compound Leaf Architecture Is Regulated by Interactions among the Genes UNIFOLIATA, COCHLEATA, AFILA, and TENDRIL-LESS , 2000, Plant Cell.

[17]  R. Hellens,et al.  UNIFOLIATA regulates leaf and flower morphogenesis in pea , 1997, Current Biology.

[18]  Miltos Tsiantis,et al.  Control of leaf and vein development by auxin. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[19]  Raghvendra Kumar Mishra,et al.  Co-regulation of biomass partitioning by leafblade morphology genes AFILA, MULTIFOLIATE-PINNA, TENDRIL-LESS and UNIFOLIATA in grain pea Pisum sativum. , 2009 .

[20]  D. Demason Extending Marx's isogenic lines in search of Uni function. , 2005 .

[21]  S. Kumar,et al.  Role of LLD, a new locus for leaflet/pinna morphogenesis in Pisum sativum. , 2001, Journal of biosciences.

[22]  V. G. Panse,et al.  Statistical methods for agricultural workers. , 1954 .