Stochastic Congestion and Pricing Model with Endogenous Departure Time Selection and Heterogeneous Travelers

In a stochastic roadway congestion and pricing model, one scheme (omniscient pricing) relies on the full knowledge of each individual journey cost and of early and late penalties of the traveler. A second scheme (observable pricing) is based on observed queuing delays only. Travelers are characterized by late-acceptance levels. The effects of various late-acceptance levels on congestion patterns with and without pricing are compared through simulations. The omniscient pricing scheme is most effective in suppressing the congestion at peak hours and in distributing travel demands over a longer time horizon. Heterogeneity of travelers reduces congestion when pricing is imposed, and congestion pricing becomes more effective when cost structures are diversified rather than identical. Omniscient pricing better reduces the expected total social cost; however, more travelers improve welfare individually with observable pricing. The benefits of a pricing scheme depend on travelers’ cost structures and on the proportion of late-tolerant, late-averse, and late-neutral travelers in the population.

[1]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Dynamic model of peak period congestion , 1984 .

[2]  Wenbin Wei Airlines' choice of aircraft size in a competitive environment , 2000 .

[3]  Xi Zou,et al.  A MULTI-AGENT CONGESTION AND PRICING MODEL , 2006 .

[4]  André de Palma,et al.  The Welfare Effects Of Congestion Tolls With Heterogeneous Commuters , 1993 .

[5]  André de Palma,et al.  Departure Time and Route Choice , 1986 .

[6]  Marco A. Marini,et al.  INDIVIDUAL UNCERTAINTY AND THE POLITICAL ACCEPTABILITY OF ROAD PRICING POLICIES. IN: ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING STRATEGIES , 2002 .

[7]  A. Palma,et al.  Economics of a bottleneck , 1986 .

[8]  D. Levinson Micro-foundations of congestion and pricing: A game theory perspective , 2005 .

[9]  J. Henderson,et al.  Economic theory and the cities , 1977 .

[10]  Hideyuki Kita,et al.  A merging–giveway interaction model of cars in a merging section: a game theoretic analysis , 1999 .

[11]  S. C. Littlechild,et al.  Aircraft Landing Fees: A Game Theory Approach , 1977 .

[12]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[13]  Michael J. Smith,et al.  The Existence of a Time-Dependent Equilibrium Distribution of Arrivals at a Single Bottleneck , 1984, Transp. Sci..

[14]  Joseph I. Daniel,et al.  Distributional Consequences of Airport Congestion Pricing , 2001 .

[15]  Robin Lindsey,et al.  DEPARTURE TIME AND ROUTE CHOICE FOR THE MORNING COMMUTE , 1990 .

[16]  Y. Cohen,et al.  COMMUTER WELFARE UNDER PEAK-PERIOD CONGESTION TOLLS : WHO GAINS AND WHO LOSES? , 1987 .

[17]  André de Palma,et al.  Recent Developments in the Bottleneck Model , 1995 .

[18]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  The Uniqueness of a Time-dependent Equilibrium Distribution of Arrivals at a Single Bottleneck , 1985, Transp. Sci..

[19]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment , 1998 .

[20]  Barry E. Prentice,et al.  ENFORCEMENT OF HIGHWAY WEIGHT REGULATIONS: A GAME THEORETIC MODEL , 1990 .

[21]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment : issues of efficiency and social feasibility , 1998 .

[22]  Joseph Irvine Daniel Peak-load-congestion pricing and optimal capacity of large hub airports : with application to the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport , 1992 .

[23]  Joseph I. Daniel,et al.  Congestion Pricing and Capacity of Large Hub Airports: A Bottleneck Model with Stochastic Queues , 1995 .

[24]  Marvin Kraus,et al.  When are Anonymous Congestion Charges Consistent with Marginal Cost Pricing? , 1994 .