Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT--IAEA-coordinated research project.

PURPOSE To measure radiation doses for computed tomography (CT) of the head, chest, and abdomen and compare them with the diagnostic reference levels, as part of the International Atomic Energy Agency Research coordination project. MATERIALS AND METHODS The local ethics committees of all participating institutions approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All scanners were helical single-section or multi-detector row CT systems. Six hundred thirty-three patients undergoing head (n = 97), chest (n = 243), or abdominal (n = 293) CT were included. Collected data included patient height, weight, sex, and age; tube voltage and tube current-time product settings; pitch; section thickness; number of sections; weighted or volumetric CT dose index; and dose-length product (DLP). The effective dose was also estimated and served as collective dose estimation data. RESULTS Mean volumetric CT dose index and DLP values were below the European diagnostic reference levels: 39 mGy and 544 mGy . cm, respectively, at head CT; 9.3 mGy and 348 mGy . cm, respectively, at chest CT; and 10.4 mGy and 549 mGy . cm, respectively, at abdominal CT. Estimated effective doses were 1.2, 5.9, and 8.2 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSION Comparison of CT results with diagnostic reference levels revealed the need for revisions, partly because the newer scanners have improved technology that facilitates lower patient doses.

[1]  DL Stella Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body , 2005 .

[2]  J. Persliden,et al.  Dose reduction in computed tomography by individualized scan protocols , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[3]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  M. Essig,et al.  Clinical experience with multihance in CNS imaging , 2003, European Radiology.

[5]  M. Osteaux,et al.  CT doses in children: a multicentre study. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Eatough,et al.  Variations in radiation dose between the same model of multislice CT scanner at different hospitals. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  M. Delichas,et al.  A contribution to the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  M. Galanski,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey , 2003, European Radiology.

[9]  D. Origgi,et al.  A survey of 14 computed tomography scanners in Greece and 32 scanners in Italy. Examination frequencies, dose reference values, effective doses and doses to organs. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  M. Staniszewska Evaluation of patient exposure in computerised tomogram in Poland. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  V. Tsapaki,et al.  Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  U. Teichgräber,et al.  Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses. , 2001, Radiology.

[13]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[14]  M. Rehani,et al.  Radiation doses in computed tomography , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  A. Al-Farsi,et al.  Radiation doses from CT in the Sultanate of Oman. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  T. Kron,et al.  Variation of patient dose in head CT. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  K J Lehmann,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  J. Petersen,et al.  Determination of Collective Effective Dose Equivalent due to Computed Tomography in Denmark in 1989 , 1992 .

[19]  J. Mccrohan,et al.  Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. , 1992, Radiology.

[20]  D. Dance,et al.  Dosimetry in diagnostic and interventional radiology: International commission on radiation units and measurements and IAEA activities , 2004 .

[21]  A Workman,et al.  Application of draft European Commission reference levels to a regional CT dose survey. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.