Examining the Public’s Most Frequently Asked Questions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines Using Search Engine Analytics in the United States: Observational Study

Background The emergency authorization of COVID-19 vaccines has offered the first means of long-term protection against COVID-19–related illness since the pandemic began. It is important for health care professionals to understand commonly held COVID-19 vaccine concerns and to be equipped with quality information that can be used to assist in medical decision-making. Objective Using Google’s RankBrain machine learning algorithm, we sought to characterize the content of the most frequently asked questions (FAQs) about COVID-19 vaccines evidenced by internet searches. Secondarily, we sought to examine the information transparency and quality of sources used by Google to answer FAQs on COVID-19 vaccines. Methods We searched COVID-19 vaccine terms on Google and used the “People also ask” box to obtain FAQs generated by Google’s machine learning algorithms. FAQs are assigned an “answer” source by Google. We extracted FAQs and answer sources related to COVID-19 vaccines. We used the Rothwell Classification of Questions to categorize questions on the basis of content. We classified answer sources as either academic, commercial, government, media outlet, or medical practice. We used the Journal of the American Medical Association’s (JAMA’s) benchmark criteria to assess information transparency and Brief DISCERN to assess information quality for answer sources. FAQ and answer source type frequencies were calculated. Chi-square tests were used to determine associations between information transparency by source type. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences in mean Brief DISCERN scores by source type. Results Our search yielded 28 unique FAQs about COVID-19 vaccines. Most COVID-19 vaccine–related FAQs were seeking factual information (22/28, 78.6%), specifically about safety and efficacy (9/22, 40.9%). The most common source type was media outlets (12/28, 42.9%), followed by government sources (11/28, 39.3%). Nineteen sources met 3 or more JAMA benchmark criteria with government sources as the majority (10/19, 52.6%). JAMA benchmark criteria performance did not significantly differ among source types (χ24=7.40; P=.12). One-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in mean Brief DISCERN scores by source type (F4,23=10.27; P<.001). Conclusions The most frequently asked COVID-19 vaccine–related questions pertained to vaccine safety and efficacy. We found that government sources provided the most transparent and highest-quality web-based COVID-19 vaccine–related information. Recognizing common questions and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines may assist in improving vaccination efforts.

[1]  N. Brewer,et al.  Predictors of willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S , 2021, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[2]  M. Kay,et al.  Societal Costs of a Measles Outbreak , 2021, Pediatrics.

[3]  M. Mills,et al.  Should spreading anti-vaccine misinformation be criminalised? , 2021, BMJ.

[4]  D. McDonnell,et al.  With Great Hopes Come Great Expectations: Access and Adoption Issues Associated With COVID-19 Vaccines , 2021, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[5]  J. Lazarus,et al.  Author Correction: A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[6]  D. Drekonja,et al.  The Erosion of Public Trust and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines— More Action Is Needed , 2021, Open forum infectious diseases.

[7]  A. Sheikh,et al.  COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Health Care Workers in the United States , 2021, medRxiv.

[8]  P. Verger,et al.  Attitudes of healthcare workers towards COVID-19 vaccination: a survey in France and French-speaking parts of Belgium and Canada, 2020 , 2021, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[9]  S. Wong,et al.  Change of Willingness to Accept COVID-19 Vaccine and Reasons of Vaccine Hesitancy of Working People at Different Waves of Local Epidemic in Hong Kong, China: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys , 2021, Vaccines.

[10]  E. Emanuel,et al.  US Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates , 2020, JAMA network open.

[11]  A. Zheluk,et al.  Plausibility of Using a Checklist With YouTube to Facilitate the Discovery of Acute Low Back Pain Self-Management Content: Exploratory Study , 2020, JMIR formative research.

[12]  S. Haas,et al.  Modern Internet Search Analytics and Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Are Patients Asking and Reading Online? , 2020, The Journal of Arthroplasty.

[13]  M. Lynas,et al.  Coronavirus misinformation: quantifying sources and themes in the COVID-19 ‘infodemic’ (Preprint) , 2020 .

[14]  J. L. Schwartz Evaluating and Deploying Covid-19 Vaccines - The Importance of Transparency, Scientific Integrity, and Public Trust. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Ryan Ottwell,et al.  Association of Public Interest in Preventive Measures and Increased COVID-19 Cases After the Expiration of Stay-at-Home Orders: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2020, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[16]  D. Allison,et al.  A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why , 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[17]  S. Crawford,et al.  Attitudes Toward a Potential SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: A Survey of U.S. Adults , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  D. Raptis,et al.  COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment , 2020, BMJ Open.

[19]  S. Soroka,et al.  Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage , 2020, Science communication.

[20]  Hilal Aksoy,et al.  While studies on COVID‐19 vaccine is ongoing, the public’s thoughts and attitudes to the future COVID‐19 vaccine , 2020, International journal of clinical practice.

[21]  M. Vassar,et al.  Public Interest in Preventive Measures of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Associated With Timely Issuance of Statewide Stay-at-Home Orders , 2020, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[22]  A. Caplan,et al.  Adverse Consequences of Rushing a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: Implications for Public Trust. , 2020, JAMA.

[23]  D. Léger,et al.  A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[24]  Linda Y. Fu,et al.  Planning for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program. , 2020, JAMA.

[25]  Matthew Motta,et al.  How Right-Leaning Media Coverage of COVID-19 Facilitated the Spread of Misinformation in the Early Stages of the Pandemic in the U.S. , 2020, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[26]  M. J. Muñóz-Pérez,et al.  Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study , 2020, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[27]  J. Kennedy Vaccine Hesitancy: A Growing Concern , 2020, Pediatric Drugs.

[28]  E. Dong,et al.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[29]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[30]  A. Kebudi,et al.  Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of Information Used in Total Extraperitoneal Procedure for Inguinal Hernia Repair Videos Shared on WebSurg , 2019, Cureus.

[31]  K. Himes,et al.  Online Information About Periviable Birth: Quality Assessment , 2019, JMIR pediatrics and parenting.

[32]  J. Goldfarb,et al.  Measles: A dangerous vaccine-preventable disease returns , 2019, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

[33]  Michelle L Holshue,et al.  Notes from the Field: Community Outbreak of Measles — Clark County, Washington, 2018–2019 , 2019, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[34]  V. Dubey,et al.  Addressing vaccine hesitancy: Clinical guidance for primary care physicians working with parents. , 2019, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[35]  M. Meadows-Oliver,et al.  Evaluating asthma websites using the Brief DISCERN instrument , 2017, Journal of asthma and allergy.

[36]  S. Azer,et al.  Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet , 2017, World journal of gastroenterology.

[37]  Jina Huh,et al.  Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[38]  J. Baker,et al.  Orthopaedic Patient Information on the World Wide Web: An Essential Review. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  N. MacDonald Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. , 2015, Vaccine.

[40]  P. Schauer,et al.  Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. , 2015, Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

[41]  P. F. Adams,et al.  Use of the internet for health information: United States, 2009. , 2011, NCHS data brief.

[42]  H. Norton,et al.  Quality and content of Internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  Yasser Khazaal,et al.  Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[44]  B. Jones,et al.  Use of the Internet for Health Information Among Primary Care Patients in Rural West Texas , 2009, Southern medical journal.

[45]  Lisa Gualtieri,et al.  The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first , 2009, ITI.

[46]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[47]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[48]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.