Building generic anatomical models using virtual model cutting and iterative registration

BackgroundUsing 3D generic models to statistically analyze trends in biological structure changes is an important tool in morphometrics research. Therefore, 3D generic models built for a range of populations are in high demand. However, due to the complexity of biological structures and the limited views of them that medical images can offer, it is still an exceptionally difficult task to quickly and accurately create 3D generic models (a model is a 3D graphical representation of a biological structure) based on medical image stacks (a stack is an ordered collection of 2D images). We show that the creation of a generic model that captures spatial information exploitable in statistical analyses is facilitated by coupling our generalized segmentation method to existing automatic image registration algorithms.MethodsThe method of creating generic 3D models consists of the following processing steps: (i) scanning subjects to obtain image stacks; (ii) creating individual 3D models from the stacks; (iii) interactively extracting sub-volume by cutting each model to generate the sub-model of interest; (iv) creating image stacks that contain only the information pertaining to the sub-models; (v) iteratively registering the corresponding new 2D image stacks; (vi) averaging the newly created sub-models based on intensity to produce the generic model from all the individual sub-models.ResultsAfter several registration procedures are applied to the image stacks, we can create averaged image stacks with sharp boundaries. The averaged 3D model created from those image stacks is very close to the average representation of the population. The image registration time varies depending on the image size and the desired accuracy of the registration. Both volumetric data and surface model for the generic 3D model are created at the final step.ConclusionsOur method is very flexible and easy to use such that anyone can use image stacks to create models and retrieve a sub-region from it at their ease. Java-based implementation allows our method to be used on various visualization systems including personal computers, workstations, computers equipped with stereo displays, and even virtual reality rooms such as the CAVE Automated Virtual Environment. The technique allows biologists to build generic 3D models of their interest quickly and accurately.

[1]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Shape averaging with diffeomorphic flows for atlas creation , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[2]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. Small The statistical theory of shape , 1996 .

[4]  Beat Schmutz,et al.  Development and validation of a generic 3D model of the distal femur , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[5]  Guy M Genin,et al.  In vivo imaging of rapid deformation and strain in an animal model of traumatic brain injury. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Scott Schaefer,et al.  Dual marching cubes: primal contouring of dual grids , 2004, 12th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2004. PG 2004. Proceedings..

[7]  Ws. Rasband ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA , 2011 .

[8]  R. Menzel,et al.  Three‐dimensional average‐shape atlas of the honeybee brain and its applications , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[10]  Steven K. Boyd,et al.  A Novel 3-D Image-Based Morphological Method for Phenotypic Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Philippe Andrey,et al.  Joint registration and averaging of multiple 3D anatomical surface models , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Automatic Construction of 3D Statistical Deformation Models Using Non-rigid Registration , 2001, MICCAI.

[14]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  3D Reconstruction of Individual Anatomy from Medical Image Data: Segmentation and Geometry Processing , 2007 .

[15]  Per Larsen,et al.  Computational mouse atlases and their application to automatic assessment of craniofacial dysmorphology caused by the Crouzon mutation Fgfr2C342Y , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  B. Argall,et al.  Simplified intersubject averaging on the cortical surface using SUMA , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Christoph W Sensen Using CAVE technology for functional genomics studies. , 2002, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[20]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  Oscar Meruvia Pastor,et al.  An Efficient Virtual Dissection Tool to Create Generic Models for Anatomical Atlases , 2009, MMVR.

[22]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Automatic Computation of Average Brain Models , 1998, MICCAI.

[23]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[24]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Brain Image Analysis and Atlas Construction , 2000 .

[25]  Tao Ju,et al.  Manifold Dual Contouring , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.