Avenues for genetic modification of radiation use efficiency in wheat.

Radiation use efficiency (RUE) of a crop is a function of several interacting physiological phenomena, each of which can be tackled independently from the point of view of genetic improvement. Although wheat breeding has not raised RUE substantially, theoretical calculations suggest room for improvement. Selection for higher rates of leaf photosynthesis at saturating light intensities (Amax) has not resulted in improved RUE of crops, perhaps in part because most leaves in a canopy are not light-saturated. However, higher Amax may be observed as a pleiotropic effect of other yield-enhancing genes (e.g. genes for reduced height). Genetic transformation of Rubisco to double its specificity for CO2 would theoretically increase Amax by perhaps 20%, and some evidence suggests that photosynthesis at sub-saturating light intensities would also be improved. However, photo-protection may be jeopardized if capacity for oxygenase activity is impaired. Photosynthetic rate of the whole eanopy can be enhanced by manipulation of leaf angle, which is under relatively simple genetic control, and possibly by manipulating leaf-N distribution throughout the canopy. Genetic diversity for adaptation of lower canopy leaves (e.g. changes in chlorophyll a:b ratio) to reduced light intensity observed in some crops needs to be investigated in wheat. Improved RUE may be achieved by increasing sink demand (i.e. kernel number) if excess photosynthetic capacity exists during grain filling, as suggested by a number of studies in which source-sink balance was manipulated. Some evidence suggests that improved sink strength may be achieved by lengthening the duration of the period for juvenile spike growth. Balancing source- and sink-strength is a complex genetic challenge since a crop will change between source and sink limitation as conditions vary during the day, and with phenological stage. Improved RUE will be partly a function of a genotype's ability to buffer itself against changes in its environment to match the demand imposed by its development. Analysis of the physiological basis of genotype by environment interactions may indicate avenues for genetic improvement. The genetic control of photosynthetic regulation may be elucidated in the future through the application of genomics. However, given a lack of specific knowledge on the genetic basis of RUE, empirical selection is currently the most powerful tool for detecting favourable genetic interactions resulting from crosses between lines with superior photosynthetic traits and other high yielding characteristics. Selection for superior segregants can be accelerated using rapidly measured physiological selection traits, such as stomatal conductance or canopy temperature depression.

[1]  G. Slafer,et al.  Source—sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat , 1994 .

[2]  M. Gale,et al.  Chapter 1 – Dwarfing genes in wheat , 1985 .

[3]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Solar tracking by plants. , 1980, Science.

[4]  D. Puckridge Photosynthesis of wheat under field conditions. III. Seasonal trends in carbon dioxide uptake of crop communities , 1971 .

[5]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CANOPY NITROGEN : AN ALTERNATIVE TRAIT TO INCREASE YIELD POTENTIAL IN WINTER CEREALS , 1997 .

[6]  H. Medrano,et al.  Species variation in Rubisco specificity factor , 1995 .

[7]  K. Mccree THE ACTION SPECTRUM, ABSORPTANCE AND QUANTUM YIELD OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN CROP PLANTS , 1971 .

[8]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Effects of elevated CO(2) and light availability on the photosynthetic light response of trees of contrasting shade tolerance. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[9]  L. T. Evans Crop evolution, adaptation, and yield , 1993 .

[10]  K. Sayre,et al.  Interpreting Genotype ✕ Environment Interaction in Wheat by Partial Least Squares Regression , 1998 .

[11]  J. Burstin,et al.  Two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins as a source of monogenic and codominant markers for population genetics and mapping the expressed genome , 1996, Heredity.

[12]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  Global Food Projections to 2020: Implications for Investment , 1995 .

[13]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes: Textbook with Exercises , 1994 .

[14]  François Tardieu,et al.  Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours , 1998 .

[15]  G. Slafer,et al.  Increases in Grain Yieid in Bread Wheat from Breeding and Associated Physiological Changes , 1994 .

[16]  Ernst-Detlef Schulze,et al.  Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis , 1995, Springer Study Edition.

[17]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Physiological and Morphological Traits Associated with Spring Wheat Yield Under Hot, Irrigated Conditions , 1994 .

[18]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Functional Genomics , 1999, Springer Netherlands.

[19]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Canopy Temperature Depression Association with Yield of Irrigated Spring Wheat Cultivars in a Hot Climate , 1996 .

[20]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance , 1999 .

[21]  J. Ransom,et al.  Improvement in the Yield Potential of Bread Wheat Adapted to Northwest Mexico 1 , 1986 .

[22]  F. Carvalho,et al.  Genetic Variation for Canopy Architecture and its Use in Wheat Breeding 1 , 1978 .

[23]  H. Rawson,et al.  Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers , 1994 .

[24]  G. E. Russell Progress in plant breeding , 1985 .

[25]  D. Calderini,et al.  Changes in grain weight as a consequence of de-graining treatments at pre- and post-anthesis in synthetic hexaploid lines of wheat (Triticum durum x T. tauschii) , 2000 .

[26]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature , 1985, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[27]  Mark Cooper,et al.  QU-GENE: a simulation platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models , 1998, Bioinform..

[28]  Matthew P. Reynolds,et al.  Physiological and Genetic Changes of Irrigated Wheat in the Post–Green Revolution Period and Approaches for Meeting Projected Global Demand , 1999 .

[29]  EVALUATING PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS TO COMPLEMENT EMPIRICAL SELECTION FOR WHEAT IN WARM ENVIRONMENTS , 1997 .

[30]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination , 1999 .

[31]  J. Nösberger,et al.  Leaf Rust Resistance Gene Lr9 and Winter Wheat Yield Reduction: II. Leaf Gas Exchange and Root Activity , 1996 .

[32]  Jhanel Wilson,et al.  A comparison of barley cultivars with different leaf inclinations , 1972 .

[33]  W. G. Duncan Leaf Angles, Leaf Area, and Canopy Photosynthesis 1 , 1971 .

[34]  B. Read,et al.  High substrate specificity factor ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from eukaryotic marine algae and properties of recombinant cyanobacterial RubiSCO containing "algal" residue modifications. , 1994, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[35]  M. Stitt,et al.  Regulation of metabolism in transgenic plants , 1995 .

[36]  J. Bingham,et al.  physiological determinants of grain yield in cereals , 1969 .

[37]  A. Gilmore,et al.  Mechanistic aspects of xanthophyll cycle‐dependent photoprotection in higher plant chloroplasts and leaves , 1997 .

[38]  R. B. Austin Yield of Wheat in the United Kingdom: Recent Advances and Prospects , 1999 .

[39]  G. Slafer,et al.  Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation , 1997, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[40]  H. Kacser,et al.  The molecular basis of dominance. , 1981, Genetics.

[41]  M. Stitt,et al.  Does Rubisco control the rate of photosynthesis and plant growth? An exercise in molecular ecophysiology , 1994 .

[42]  E. Koshkin,et al.  Yield and source/sink relations of spring wheat cultivars , 1989 .

[43]  Murchie,et al.  Interactions between senescence and leaf orientation determine in situ patterns of photosynthesis and photoinhibition in field-grown rice , 1999, Plant physiology.

[44]  M. P. Reynolds,et al.  Increasing yield potential in wheat : breaking the barriers. Proceedings of a workshop held in Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico , 1996 .

[45]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in Northwest Mexico , 1997 .

[46]  S. Dencic Designing a Wheat Ideotype with Increased Sink Capacity , 1994 .

[47]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment: II. Traits associated with genetic gains in yield , 2000 .

[48]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Flag Leaf Photosynthesis of Triticum aestivum and Related Diploid and Tetraploid Species , 1982 .

[49]  Joseph A. Berry,et al.  Quantum efficiency of Photosystem II in relation to ‘energy’-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1987 .

[50]  C. Osmond,et al.  Perspectives on photoinhibition and photorespiration in the field: quintessential inefficiencies of the light and dark reactions of photosynthesis? , 1995 .

[51]  C. J. Nelson Genetic associations between photosynthetic characteristics and yield: review of the evidence , 1988 .

[52]  D. Ort,et al.  Consideration of photosynthetic efficiency at low light as a major determinant of crop photosynthetic performance , 1988 .

[53]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology , 1991 .

[54]  P. Jamieson,et al.  Physiological and agronomic limits to wheat yield and quality , 1992 .

[55]  H. K. Jain,et al.  Eighty years of wheat breeding in India: past selection pressures and future prospects , 1982 .

[56]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[57]  G. Slafer,et al.  Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height , 1998 .

[58]  G. Slafer,et al.  Genetic-improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain-yield , 1990 .

[59]  D. Ashley,et al.  Heritability of Canopy-Apparent Photosynthesis and Its Relationship to Seed Yield in Soybeans 1 , 1981 .

[60]  G. Slafer,et al.  Genetic improvement in wheat yield and associated traits. A re‐examination of previous results and the latest trends , 1995 .

[61]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Consequences of breeding on biomass, radiation interception and radiation-use efficiency in wheat , 1997 .

[62]  M. Parry,et al.  Variation in the Specificity Factor of C3 Higher Plant Rubiscos Determined by the Total Consumption of Ribulose-P2 , 1989 .

[63]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[64]  B. Demmig‐Adams,et al.  Regulation of Photosynthetic Light Energy Capture, Conversion, and Dissipation in Leaves of Higher Plants , 1994 .

[65]  John R. Porter,et al.  A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[66]  E. Newsholme,et al.  Regulation of Metabolism , 1973 .

[67]  J. Ransom,et al.  The yield of durum wheats released in Mexico between 1960 and 1984 , 1987, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[68]  J. Araus,et al.  Leaf Posture, Grain Yield, Growth, Leaf Structure, and Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Wheat , 1993 .

[69]  S. Miyachi,et al.  Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from thermophilic red algae with a strong specificity for CO2 fixation. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[70]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation , 1989, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[71]  R. Blackwell,et al.  Some effects of leaf posture on the yield and water economy of winter wheat , 1983, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[72]  M. Gent,et al.  Physiological and Agronomic Consequences of Rht Genes in Wheat , 1997 .

[73]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. , 1970 .

[74]  William J. Davies,et al.  Root Signals and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil , 1991 .

[75]  Z. Chalabi,et al.  Use of models to investigate the link between the modification of photosynthetic characteristics and improved crop yields , 1988 .

[76]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies , 1998 .

[77]  D. Rasmusson A plant breeder's experience with ideotype breeding , 1991 .

[78]  R. Singh,et al.  Agronomic effects from chromosome translocations 7DL.7AG and 1BL.1RS in spring wheat , 1998 .

[79]  J. R. Evans Photosynthetic Acclimation and Nitrogen Partitioning Within a Lucerne Canopy. I. Canopy Characteristics , 1993 .

[80]  Prem S. Bindraban,et al.  GRAIN YIELD IN WHEAT : EFFECTS OF RADIATION DURING SPIKE GROWTH PERIOD , 1997 .

[81]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment: I: Genetic diversity and crop productivity , 2000 .

[82]  D. Charles-Edwards An Analysis of the Photosynthesis and Productivity of Vegetative Crops in the United Kingdom , 1978 .

[83]  R. Percy,et al.  Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures , 1998 .

[84]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes , 1994, Current Issues in Production Ecology.

[85]  Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought , 1996 .