Growth regime map for liquid-bound granules

A regime map of granule growth behavior is proposed based on granule deformation during collision and the granule liquid content measured as the maximum pore saturation. The granule deformability on collision is represented by a deformation number, which is a ratio of granule impact energy to the plastic energy absorbed per unit strain. Granule growth regimes such as steady growth, induction, nudeation, crumb, and slurry are defined. Ttus regime map qualitatively explains the variations in granulation behavior. Laboratory drum granulation experiments were used to test the regime map. Experiments were performed in a 0.3-m-dia. drum using three sizes of glass ballotini (19, 31, and 60 μm) with water andglycerol as liquid binders. Increasing granule yield stress by decreasing particle size and increasing binder viscosity caused the system to move from steady growth to induction behavior as predicted by the regime map. Preliminary validation with literature data was also encouraging. More work, however, is required to better quantify the boundaries bet\veen different growth regimes and to investigate the effect of process agitation intensity. Tfiis regime map has great potential to help design and control granulation systems, because it is based on properties of the powder/binder system that can be measured or estimated without performing any granulation tests.

[1]  James D. Litster,et al.  Fundamental studies of granule consolidation Part 1: Effects of binder content and binder viscosity , 1996 .

[2]  M. Ritala,et al.  A Comparison Between Binders in the Wet Phase of Granulation in a High Shear Mixer , 1986 .

[3]  James D. Litster,et al.  Liquid-bound granule impact deformation and coefficient of restitution , 1998 .

[4]  Kalanadh V.S. Sastry,et al.  Similarity size distribution of agglomerates during their growth by coalescence in granulation or green pelletization , 1975 .

[5]  B. J. Ennis,et al.  A microlevel-based characterization of granulation phenomena , 1991 .

[6]  M. Ritala,et al.  Influence of Liquid Bonding Strength on Power Consumption During Granulation in a High Shear Mixer , 1988 .

[7]  Tatsuo Tanaka,et al.  The Probability of Coalescence in Granulation Kinetics , 1975 .

[8]  N. Ouchiyama,et al.  Estimation of the Average Number of Contacts between Randomly Mixed Solid Particles , 1980 .

[9]  J. B. Hawkyard,et al.  A theory for the mushrooming of flat-ended projectiles impinging on a flat rigid anvil, using energy considerations , 1969 .

[10]  W. Herrmann,et al.  Deformation behaviour of agglomerates under tensile stress , 1975 .

[11]  P. Mort,et al.  Critical parameters and limiting conditions in binder granulation of fine powders , 1997 .

[12]  Bryan J. Ennis,et al.  The influence of viscosity on the strength of an axially strained pendular liquid bridge , 1990 .

[13]  Torben Schæfer,et al.  Mechanical properties of moist agglomerates in relation to granulation mechanisms part II. Effects of particle size distribution , 1985 .

[14]  P. C. Knight,et al.  An investigation into the effects of binder viscosity on agglomeration behaviour , 1997 .

[15]  W. Pietsch.  Size enlargement by agglomeration , 1991 .

[16]  H. Kristensen,et al.  Granulation in high-speed mixers Part V. Power consumption and temperature changes during granulation , 1985 .

[17]  P. C. Kapur,et al.  Coalescence Model for Granulation , 1969 .