Energy Dissipation on Flat-Sloped Stepped Spillways: Part 1. Upstream of the Inception Point

In recent years, hazard classifications for many existing embankment dams have changed because hydrologic conditions have been altered. Consequently, many of these dams no longer provide adequate spillway capacity according to state and federal dam safety regulations. Stepped spillways are a popular choice for providing increased spillway capacities to existing embankment dams. Stepped spillways in these applications are typically placed over the existing embankment or auxiliary spillway; thereby, the chute slope is the same as the downstream embankment face or auxiliary spillway slope. Design guidelines and literature in general for these stepped spillways are very limited, so further research on these stepped spillways is warranted. A two-dimensional, physical model was constructed to evaluate the inception point, velocities, and energy dissipation in a 4(H):1(V) spillway chute having 38 mm (1.5 in.) high steps. Model unit discharges ranging from 0.11 m3 s-1 m-1 (1.2 cfs ft-1) to 0.82 m3 s-1 m-1 (8.8 cfs ft-1) were tested. Water surfaces, bed surfaces, and velocities were collected during the tests. An inception point relationship provided by H. Chanson may be used to determine the inception point for slopes as flat as 4(H):1(V) when F* ranges between 10 and 100. The velocity profiles transition from uniform at the crest to approaching a one-sixth power law distribution at the inception point for all tested flows. Energy losses increase in a linear fashion from near zero at the crest to approximately 30% near the inception point for all tested flows. This research will assist engineers with the design of stepped spillways applied on relatively flat embankment dams.

[1]  Kem C. Kadavy,et al.  Converging RCC Stepped Spillways , 2006 .

[2]  K. W. Frizell,et al.  On the Performance of Velocity Measurement Techniques in Air-Water Flows , 2002 .

[3]  P. Veerabhadra Rao,et al.  Hydraulics Of Skimming Flows Over Stepped Channels And Spillways , 2010 .

[4]  M. Horner,et al.  Hydraulic Design of Stepped Spillways , 1972 .

[5]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Turbulence and Turbulent Length and Time Scales in Skimming Flows on a Stepped Spillway. Dynamic Similarity, Physical Modelling and Scale Effects , 2008 .

[6]  Anna Hughes NewsBriefs: Billions Required to Repair Dams (Association of State Dam Safety Officials) , 2004 .

[7]  Jean G. Chatila,et al.  Stepped Spillway as an Energy Dissipater , 2004 .

[8]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Self-Aeration and Turbulence in a Stepped Channel: Influence of Cavity Surface Roughness , 2006 .

[9]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Hydraulic Design of Stepped Cascades, Channels, Weirs and Spillways , 1994 .

[10]  Gholam-Abbas Barani,et al.  Investigation of Flow Energy Dissipation over Different Stepped Spillways , 2005 .

[11]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Energy Dissipation on Stepped Spillways , 1995 .

[12]  Sherry L. Hunt,et al.  Inception Point Relationship for Flat-Sloped Stepped Spillways , 2009 .

[13]  L Peyras,et al.  Flow and Energy Dissipation Over Stepped Gabion Weirs , 1992 .

[14]  Sherry L. Hunt,et al.  Velocities and Energy Dissipation on a Flat-sloped Stepped Spillway , 2008 .

[15]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Two-Phase Flow Characteristics of Stepped Spillways , 2003 .

[16]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Discussions: Model Study of a Roller Compacted Concrete Stepped Spillway , 1997 .

[17]  Hubert Chanson Characteristics of skimming flow over stepped spillways: discussion , 2000 .

[18]  Carlos A. Gonzalez,et al.  An Experimental Study of Free-surface Aeration on Embankment Stepped Chutes , 2005 .

[19]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Energy Dissipation and Air Entrainment in Stepped Storm Waterway: Experimental Study , 2002 .

[20]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Hydraulics of Stepped Chutes and Spillways , 2002 .

[21]  T. Sturm,et al.  Open Channel Hydraulics , 2001 .