Measuring Visual Shape using Computer Graphics Psychophysics

This paper reviews recent psychophysical methods that have been developed for measuring the perceived shape of objects. We discuss two types of shape ambiguities that exist for many objects — a depth reversal ambiguity and an affine ambiguity. We show that people perceptually resolve these shape ambiguities by making strong prior assumptions the object.

[1]  V Bruce,et al.  Independent Effects of Lighting, Orientation, and Stereopsis on the Hollow-Face Illusion , 1993, Perception.

[2]  J T Todd,et al.  The Discriminability of Local Surface Structure , 1996, Perception.

[3]  Matthew Turk,et al.  A Morphable Model For The Synthesis Of 3D Faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  J. Todd,et al.  Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Surface perception in pictures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  The Bas-Relief Ambiguity , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Depth Discrimination from Shading under Diffuse Lighting , 2000, Perception.

[8]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  J. Todd,et al.  Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation , 1990 .

[10]  J. Todd,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Light Source Dependence in Shape from Shading , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Categorical Local-Shape Perception , 1996, Perception.

[13]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Local and global shape estimates of binocularly-viewed real objects are consistent , 1996 .

[14]  J T Todd,et al.  Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J T Todd,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Relative Surface Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[16]  T. Troscianko,et al.  AI and the eye , 1990 .

[17]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  D Kersten,et al.  Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth , 1997, Perception.

[19]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Integration of Stereo, Shading and Texture , 1990 .

[21]  James T. Todd,et al.  Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. , 1989 .

[22]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Perturbation Study of Shading in Pictures , 1996, Perception.

[23]  S. M. Shape-from-shading on a cloudy day , 1992 .

[24]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[25]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparisons , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Roger A. Browse,et al.  Choosing Rendering Parameters for Effective Communication of 3D Shape , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Perception of local shape from shading , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[30]  J T Todd,et al.  Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  K Berbaum,et al.  Extending the Perception of Shape from Known to Unknown Shading , 1984, Perception.