Policies for Enhancing Corporate Environmental Management: a Framework and an Applied Example

This paper develops a four-phase schematic representation dubbed the CEM lifecycle for conceptualizing how corporate environmental management (CEM) programs typically evolve in a given organization and then explicates the forces that influence corporate commitment as a CEM program progresses from inception to later phases of the CEM lifecycle. Examples are then presented on how the Singaporean government encourages enhancement of CEM programs by designing support programs that target the underlying corporate needs inherent to the first three CEM lifecycle phases. The examples provided in this paper of Singaporean CEM support programs illustrate how policy can be strategically designed to improve corporate uptake of CEM programs by enhancing CEM knowledge in the initial phase of the CEM lifecycle, providing technical support in the second lifecycle phase and providing opportunities for public recognition in the third lifecycle phase. The article concludes that replicating the strategic approach to policymaking exemplified in the Singaporean case study can significantly improve the competitiveness of domestic firms through encouraging more efficient use of resources; however, in order to design truly sustainable economies (provide for the needs of future generations), governments must be prepared to more coercively regulate the exploitation of natural endowments. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  Scott Victor Valentine,et al.  Japanese wind energy development policy: Grand plan or group think? , 2011 .

[2]  S. Valentine.  The Fuzzy Nature of Energy Security , 2010 .

[3]  Florencia Marotta-Wurgler.  Does Disclosure Matter? , 2010 .

[4]  Scott Victor Valentine,et al.  The Green Onion: a corporate environmental strategy framework , 2010 .

[5]  S. Valentine,et al.  A STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK: EVALUATING THE PROFITABILITY OF BEING GREEN , 2010 .

[6]  Jon T. S. Quah.  Public Administration Singapore-Style , 2010 .

[7]  S. Valentine.  Disarming the population bomb , 2010 .

[8]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[9]  M. Yakhou,et al.  Environmental accounting: an essential component of business strategy , 2004 .

[10]  Pontus Cerin,et al.  Communication in corporate environmental reports , 2002 .

[11]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  LEAN AND GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAN PRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[12]  Sarah D. Stanwick,et al.  Designing Your International M&A Strategy , 2001 .

[13]  A. Kolk,et al.  Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry , 2001 .

[14]  Jay J. Janney,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[15]  M. Kiernan,et al.  Eco-Value, Sustainability, and Shareholder Value: Driving Environmental Performance to the Bottom Line , 2001 .

[16]  Sarah D. Stanwick,et al.  Cut Your Risks with Environmental Auditing , 2001 .

[17]  Geoffrey Frost,et al.  Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory , 2000 .

[18]  S. Douglas Beets,et al.  Corporate Environmental Reports: The Need for Standards and an Environmental Assurance Service , 1999 .

[19]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution , 1998 .

[20]  M. Howlett,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems , 1996 .

[21]  C. Linde,et al.  Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate , 1995 .

[22]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[23]  C. Hood.  The Tools of Government , 1983 .

[24]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[25]  A. Spilhaus,et al.  The Next Industrial Revolution , 1970, Science.

[26]  Michael Schwarz,et al.  American Economic Association , 1891 .

[27]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[28]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[29]  D. Esty.  Green to Gold , 2006 .

[30]  Denis Cormier,et al.  Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality , 2004 .

[31]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[32]  M. Braungart,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[33]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector , 2001 .

[34]  F. Reinhardt.  Bringing the environment down to earth. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[35]  M. Bemelmans-videc.  Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. , 1998 .

[36]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Carrots, sticks & sermons : policy instruments & their evaluation , 1998 .

[37]  S. Hart.  Beyond Greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World. , 1997 .

[38]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[39]  D. Norton,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[40]  Paul Hawken,et al.  The Ecology of Commerce , 1993 .

[41]  P. James.  The future of coal , 1982 .

[42]  P. Cerin.  1 Communication in corporate environmental reports , 2022 .