A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method.

OBJECTIVES To systematically identify, define, and classify emerging knowledge synthesis methods through a scoping review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Methodology Register, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Social Sciences Abstracts, Library and Information Science Abstracts, Philosopher's Index, and Education Resources Information Center were searched to identify articles reporting emerging knowledge synthesis methods across the disciplines of health, education, sociology, and philosophy. Two reviewers independently selected studies and abstracted data for each article. RESULTS In total, 409 articles reporting on 25 knowledge synthesis methods were included after screening of 17,962 titles and abstracts and 1,010 potentially relevant full-text articles. Most of the included articles were an application of the method (83.9%); only 3.7% were seminal articles that fully described the method (i.e., operationalized the steps). Most of the included articles were published after 2005. The methods were most commonly used across the fields of nursing, health care science and services, and health policy. CONCLUSION We found a lack of guidance on how to select a knowledge synthesis method. We propose convening an international group of leaders in the knowledge synthesis field to help clarify emerging approaches to knowledge synthesis.

[1]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups , 2006 .

[2]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[4]  A. Tricco,et al.  Introduction: Engaging researchers on developing, using, and improving knowledge synthesis methods: a series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  K. O'rourke,et al.  An historical perspective on meta-analysis: Dealing quantitatively with varying study results , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[6]  K. Hannes,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach , 2012 .

[7]  A. Tricco,et al.  What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  Jennifer D'Souza,et al.  Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Old People and Mental Hospitals , 1965, British medical journal.

[10]  Lorraine O. Walker,et al.  Strategies for theory construction in nursing , 1983 .

[11]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Mae Keary,et al.  The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[14]  H. Butcher,et al.  Guided Imagery within Rogers' Science of Unitary Human Beings: An Experimental Study , 1988, Nursing science quarterly.

[15]  R. Rosenthal Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[16]  Faith Gibson,et al.  The experience of living with a chronic illness during adolescence: a critical review of the literature. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[17]  Jane Noyes,et al.  Knowledge and information needs of young people with epilepsy and their parents: Mixed-method systematic review , 2010, BMC pediatrics.

[18]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews , 1986 .

[19]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[20]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Developing an Evaluation for Crosscutting Policy Goals: The Accessibility Policy Assessment Tool , 2009 .

[21]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[22]  G. Glass Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[23]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.