How the chemotactic characteristics of bacteria can determine their population patterns

Highlights • An individual-based model was developed and coupled to a pore-network model. • The bacterial distribution patterns were geostatistically analyzed. • The effects from bacterial chemotactic properties on bacterial distribution patterns were examined. • The additional influences from structural heterogeneities were examined. Abstract Spatial distribution of soil microorganisms is relevant for the functioning and performance of many ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling or biodegradation of organic matters and contaminants. Beside the multitude of abiotic environmental factors controlling the distribution of microorganisms in soil systems, many microbial species exhibit chemotactic behavior by directing their movement along concentration gradients of nutrients or of chemoattractants produced by cells of their own kind. This chemotactic ability has been shown to promote the formation of complex distribution patterns even in the absence of environmental heterogeneities. Microbial population patterns in heterogeneous soil systems might be, hence, the result of the interplay between the heterogeneous environmental conditions and the microorganisms' intrinsic pattern formation capabilities. In this modeling study, we combined an individual-based modeling approach with a reactive pore-network model to investigate the formation of bacterial patterns in homogeneous and heterogeneous porous media. We investigated the influence of different bacterial chemotactic sensitivities (toward both substrate and bacteria) on bacterial distribution patterns. The emerging population patterns were classified with the support of a geostatistical approach, and the required conditions for the formation of any specific pattern were analyzed. Results showed that the chemotactic behavior of the bacteria leads to non-trivial population patterns even in the absence of environmental heterogeneities. The presence of structural pore scale heterogeneities had also an impact on bacterial distributions. For a range of chemotactic sensitivities, microorganisms tend to migrate preferably from larger pores toward smaller pores and the resulting distribution patterns thus resembled the heterogeneity of the pore space. The results clearly indicated that in a porous medium like soil the distribution of bacteria may not only be related to the external constraints but also to the chemotactic behavior of the bacterial cells.

[1]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Mathematical Description of Bacterial Traveling Pulses , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  D. Wardle,et al.  Spatial soil ecology , 2002 .

[3]  Florian Centler,et al.  Modeling population patterns of chemotactic bacteria in homogeneous porous media. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  N. Darnton,et al.  Influence of topology on bacterial social interaction , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A Libchaber,et al.  Solitary modes of bacterial culture in a temperature gradient. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[6]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Bacteria harnessing complexity , 2004 .

[7]  Grundmann,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of the distribution of NH(4)(+) and NO(2)(-)-oxidizing bacteria and serotypes at the millimeter scale along a soil transect. , 2000, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[8]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship , 2000 .

[9]  M. Sommer,et al.  Variability of soil methane production on the micro-scale: spatial association with hot spots of organic material and Archaeal populations , 2000 .

[10]  Philip J Binning,et al.  Biodegradation in a partially saturated sand matrix: compounding effects of water content, bacterial spatial distribution, and motility. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  M. Kuypers,et al.  Detecting metabolic activities in single cells, with emphasis on nanoSIMS. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[12]  S. Morris Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial biomass in southern Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns , 1999 .

[13]  M. L. Porter,et al.  Upscaling microbial chemotaxis in porous media , 2009 .

[14]  Peter Blaser,et al.  Preferential Flow Paths: Biological Hot Spots in Soils , 2001 .

[15]  Pierre Regnier,et al.  Modeling the impact of microbial activity on redox dynamics in porous media , 2005 .

[16]  J. Crawford,et al.  Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[17]  Thomas Williams,et al.  Gnuplot 4.4: an interactive plotting program , 2010 .

[18]  K. Painter,et al.  Volume-filling and quorum-sensing in models for chemosensitive movement , 2002 .

[19]  Nathalie Tufenkji,et al.  Modeling microbial transport in porous media: Traditional approaches and recent developments , 2007 .

[20]  R. Harshey,et al.  Cell density and mobility protect swarming bacteria against antibiotics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Franklin,et al.  The spatial distribution of microbes in the environment , 2007 .

[22]  E. Kandeler,et al.  Plot-scale spatial patterns of soil water content, pH, substrate-induced respiration and N mineralization in a temperate coniferous forest , 1999 .

[23]  B. Griffiths,et al.  Spatial distribution and successional pattern of microbial activity and micro-faunal populations on decomposing barley roots , 1996 .

[24]  R. Franklin,et al.  Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[25]  Pierre Régnier,et al.  A reactive transport modeling approach to simulate biogeochemical processes in pore structures with pore-scale heterogeneities , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Amir Raoof,et al.  PoreFlow: A complex pore-network model for simulation of reactive transport in variably saturated porous media , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  M. D. Aitken,et al.  Bacterial Chemotaxis Enhances Naphthalene Degradation in a Heterogeneous Aqueous System , 2000 .

[28]  G. Robertson,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration and related properties at the plant scale , 2000, Plant and Soil.

[29]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis of bacteria in glass capillary arrays. Escherichia coli, motility, microchannel plate, and light scattering. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[30]  T. Balser,et al.  Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. , 2007, Ecology.

[31]  E. Bååth,et al.  Spatial variation and patterns of soil microbial community structure in a mixed spruce-birch stand. , 2000 .

[32]  P. Maloszewski,et al.  Transport and bacterial interactions of three bacterial strains in saturated column experiments. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  R. M. Ford,et al.  Quantitative analysis of transverse bacterial migration induced by chemotaxis in a packed column with structured physical heterogeneity. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  R. Franklin,et al.  A geostatistical analysis of small-scale spatial variability in bacterial abundance and community structure in salt marsh creek bank sediments. , 2002, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[35]  R. Austin,et al.  Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J. W. Barton,et al.  Mathematical model for characterization of bacterial migration through sand cores. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[37]  M. L. Martins,et al.  Reaction-diffusion model for the growth of avascular tumor. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  C. Harwood,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis to pollutants and plant-derived aromatic molecules. , 2002, Current opinion in microbiology.

[39]  R. M. Ford,et al.  Coupled effect of chemotaxis and growth on microbial distributions in organic-amended aquifer sediments: observations from laboratory and field studies. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Dani Or,et al.  Aquatic habitats and diffusion constraints affecting microbial coexistence in unsaturated porous media , 2005 .

[41]  Roseanne M. Ford,et al.  Role of chemotaxis in the transport of bacteria through saturated porous media , 2007 .

[42]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Mass transfer limitation of biotransformation: quantifying bioavailability , 1997 .

[43]  J. Selker,et al.  Coupled Microbial and Transport Processes in Soils , 2004 .

[44]  L. Segel,et al.  Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  R. Franklin,et al.  Importance of spatially structured environmental heterogeneity in controlling microbial community composition at small spatial scales in an agricultural field , 2009 .

[46]  J. Murray,et al.  Model and analysis of chemotactic bacterial patterns in a liquid medium , 1999, Journal of mathematical biology.

[47]  H. Berg,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns generated by Salmonella typhimurium. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[48]  H. Harms,et al.  Microbial growth with vapor-phase substrate. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[49]  Rainer Horn,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography , 2008 .

[50]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Accuracy of operator splitting for advection‐dispersion‐reaction problems , 1992 .

[51]  Bland J. Finlay,et al.  Microbial diversity and ecosystem function , 1997 .

[52]  P T Cummings,et al.  Residence time calculation for chemotactic bacteria within porous media. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[53]  Kirk T. Semple,et al.  Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis , 2003 .

[54]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[55]  M. Brenner,et al.  Motility of Escherichia coli cells in clusters formed by chemotactic aggregation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  H. Berg,et al.  Dynamics of formation of symmetrical patterns by chemotactic bacteria , 1995, Nature.

[57]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Linear exchange model for the description of mass transfer limited bioavailability at the pore scale. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  Mark Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical modelling of host-parasitoid systems: effects of chemically mediated parasitoid foraging strategies on within- and between-generation spatio-temporal dynamics. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  H. Harms,et al.  Mass transfer limitation of microbial growth and pollutant degradation , 1997, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[60]  Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated , 2006 .

[61]  Timothy Scheibe,et al.  Processes in microbial transport in the natural subsurface , 2002 .