Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, has shown clinical efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy, measured according to the rate of pathological complete response (absence of invasive and intraductal disease in the breast and the axillary lymph nodes), and the safety of adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS We randomly assigned 1948 patients with a median tumor size of 40 mm on palpation to receive neoadjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, with or without concomitant bevacizumab. Patients with untreated HER2-negative breast cancer were eligible if they had large tumors, hormone-receptor-negative disease, or hormone-receptor-positive disease with palpable nodes or positive findings on sentinel-node biopsy, and no increased cardiovascular or bleeding risk. RESULTS Overall, the rates of pathological complete response were 14.9% with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and 18.4% with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus bevacizumab (odds ratio with addition of bevacizumab, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.65; P=0.04); the corresponding rates of pathological complete response were 27.9% and 39.3% among 663 patients with triple-negative tumors (P=0.003) and 7.8% and 7.7% among 1262 patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors (P=1.00). Breast-conserving surgery was possible in 66.6% of the patients in both groups. The addition of bevacizumab, as compared with neoadjuvant therapy alone, was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxic effects (febrile neutropenia, mucositis, the hand-foot syndrome, infection, and hypertension) but with a similar incidence of surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the rate of pathological complete response among patients with HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. Efficacy was restricted primarily to patients with triple-negative tumors, in whom the pathological complete response is considered to be a reliable predictor of long-term outcome. (Funded by Sanofi-Aventis and Roche, Germany; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00567554.).

[1]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. , 1981 .

[2]  Arlene Chan,et al.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Fasching,et al.  Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Disease course patterns after discontinuation of bevacizumab: pooled analysis of randomized phase III trials. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[6]  S. Loibl,et al.  Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Xian Zhou,et al.  RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  T. Fehm,et al.  Integrating bevacizumab, everolimus, and lapatinib into current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for primary breast cancer. Safety results of the GeparQuinto trial. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  C. Denkert,et al.  Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[14]  James A Young,et al.  Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Fasching,et al.  Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Peter A Fasching,et al.  Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  J. Baselga,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort , 2010, The Lancet.

[18]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[22]  J. Thigpen RIBBON-1: Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[23]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  V. Miller,et al.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIIb trial (ATLAS) comparing bevacizumab (B) therapy with or without erlotinib (E) after completion of chemotherapy with B for first-line treatment of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Does Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Increase Surgical Complications in Breast Surgery? , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.