Conceptual Structure and its Relation to the Structure of Lexical Entries

Recent work in generative grammar and the theory of the lexicon (Guerssel et al. 1983, Hale and Keyser 1987, Jackendoff 1983, Levin and Rappaport 1986) posits a level of linguistic representation, referred to as Lexical Conceptual Structure (LCS), at which syntactic and semantic properties of lexical items, and certain regularities between the two sets of properties are represented. LCS represents an improvement from the simple sets of features used to represent word meanings in early semantic theories (e.g. Katz and Fodor 1963) to a powerful notation for expressing predicate-argument and other kinds of semantic relations in natural language utterances. Current formulations of the LCS system (Jackendoff 1983) include processing mechanisms that capture semantic relations between expressions, such as synonymy, common-sense entailment, etc; the mechanisms include preference rules and default inference.

[1]  David M. Perlmutter Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[2]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax , 1987 .

[3]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  A view from the middle , 1987 .

[4]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[5]  J. Koster Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax , 1987 .

[6]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[7]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[8]  A. Church The calculi of lambda-conversion , 1941 .

[9]  R. Jackendoff The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[10]  Branimir Boguraev,et al.  Large Lexicons for Natural Language Processing: Utilising the Grammar Coding System of LDOCE , 1987, CL.

[11]  Luigi Burzio,et al.  Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[13]  Margaret S. Benson The structure of four- and five-year-olds' narratives in pretend play and storytelling , 1993 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[15]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[16]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Computer Models of Thought and Language , 1974 .

[17]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[18]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[19]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[20]  Paul van Geert,et al.  Knowledge and representation , 1982 .

[21]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .

[22]  Jeffrey Gruber Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[23]  William Croft,et al.  Commonsense Metaphysics and Lexical Semantics , 1986, ACL.

[24]  R. Jackendoff Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[25]  B. Levin,et al.  The formation of adjectival passives , 1985 .

[26]  Y. Wilks Methodological questions about artificial intelligence: Approaches to understanding natural language , 1977 .

[27]  E. Williams Argument Structure and Morphology , 1981 .

[28]  S. Carroll Noam Chomsky. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 6. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Pp. viii + 110 , 1983, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[29]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .

[30]  Jerry R. Hobbs Ontological Promiscuity , 1985, ACL.

[31]  Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[32]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[33]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[34]  Noam Chomsky Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[35]  E. Williams A reassignment of the function of LF , 1986 .

[36]  Nelson Correa Syntactic analysis of english with respect to government-binding grammar , 1988 .