Abstract Green building is receiving increased attention in the public sector in the United States. Over the past ten years, public sector organizations have gone from “testing the waters” with green building pilot projects to developing wide-reaching policies that incorporate green building practices and standards as a formal part of capital project decision processes. A variety of approaches have been employed at the federal, state, and local levels that encourage or require green building practices on public sector projects. To date, however, there has been no systematic evaluation of the pros and cons of these policy options to provide a basis for organizations considering how best to construct a program to meet the needs of its specific context. This paper identifies, compares, and contrasts options that have been incorporated as part of green building programs for states and other public sector organization seeking to motivate green building practices in their capital projects and facilities. Three ...
[1]
P. C. Mohan Munasinghe,et al.
Environmental economics and sustainable development
,
1991
.
[2]
Peter James,et al.
The Green Bottom Line
,
1998
.
[3]
Woodrow H. Sears,et al.
Building on Common Ground
,
2001
.
[4]
W. D. Browning,et al.
Greening the bottom line: increasing productivity through energy-efficient design
,
1995
.
[5]
Annie R. Pearce,et al.
Green Construction: Contractor Experiences, Expectations, and Perceptions
,
2007
.
[6]
Annie R. Pearce,et al.
Sustainability in Public Facilities: Analysis of Guidance Documents
,
2003
.
[7]
Annie R. Pearce,et al.
Analysis of State-Wide Green Building Policies
,
2007
.
[8]
John Elkington,et al.
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
,
1998
.
[9]
Annie R. Pearce,et al.
Drivers for Change: An Organizational Perspective on Sustainable Construction
,
2000
.