The Use of Two Electronic Idea Generation Techniques in Strategy Planning Meetings

Numerous studies have compared groups using oral brainstorming with groups utilizing an electronic technique based upon individual poolwriting, but very few studies have investigated groups using other electronic meeting techniques. Some research, however, indicates that one alternative electronic meeting technique based upon gallery writing may be superior to individual poolwriting in many situations. In this paper, we report a case involving five groups of stakeholders who used the two different electronic meeting techniques to discuss ways of improving a local private school. Survey results from the groups support findings from earlier laboratory experiments. Participants in the case study preferred electronic gallery writing over electronic poolwriting because of the former's ability to show users all of the groups'comments at the same time.

[1]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[2]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Milam Aiken,et al.  Idea generation with electronic poolwriting and gallery writing , 1996 .

[4]  Victor H. Vroom,et al.  The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving , 1969 .

[5]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  GDSS laboratory experiments and field studies: closing the gap , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[8]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[9]  Elizabeth W. Freeburg Idea Power: Techniques and Resources to Unleash the Creativity in Your Organization, by Arthur Van Gundy. (1992). New York: AMACOM. 240 pp., $24.95 cloth , 1994 .

[10]  Milam Aiken,et al.  An automated idea consolidation tool for computer supported cooperative work , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Group Decision Support System impact: Multi-methodological exploration , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Hsin-Ginn Hwang,et al.  The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi conferencing: Computer-based conferencing with anonymity , 1971 .

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[16]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[17]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Student Guinea Pigs: Porcine Predictors and Particularistic Phenomena , 1987 .

[18]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[19]  G. A. Milton Enthusiasm vs Effectiveness in Group and Individual Problem-Solving , 1965 .

[20]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[22]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[23]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  A comparison of individual, subgroup, and total group methods of problem solving. , 1974 .

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[25]  Sukumar Rathnam,et al.  Groupware: a survey of perceptions and practice , 1992, SIGO.

[26]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight , 1987 .

[27]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Two Different Electronic Meeting System Tools for the Same Task: An Experimental Comparison , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques , 1996, Inf. Manag..