Publisher Summary This chapter presents the grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. Grammatical Construction Theory differs from a number of other frameworks, first in its insistence that syntactic patterns are often tightly associated with interpretation instructions, but secondly, in that it takes as a major part of its assignment the task of accounting for the workings of complex grammatical constructions as well as simple ones. The chapter only focuses on the structures that can be fully understood in terms of their constituent elements, but also in constructions that are complex to begin with. In Grammatical Construction Theory, constructions are taken as structured but not strictly decomposable, that is, they are taken as having properties in the manner of the properties of a gestalt in Gestalt Psychology. The properties of a construction may often be seen as motivated by, but they do not necessarily follow from any facts about their composition.
[1]
Kenneth L. Pike,et al.
Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd rev. ed.
,
1967
.
[2]
Knud Lambrecht,et al.
Formulaicity, frame semantics, and pragmatics in German binomial expressions
,
1984
.
[3]
Knud Lambrecht.
Topic, Focus, and the Grammar of Spoken French
,
1986
.
[4]
George Lakoff,et al.
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
,
1987
.
[5]
Jerry Morgan.
Some Interactions of Syntax and Pragmatics
,
1975
.
[6]
B. Comrie,et al.
On Conditionals: CONDITIONALS: A TYPOLOGY
,
1986
.
[7]
J. Fodor,et al.
The structure of a semantic theory
,
1963
.
[8]
C. Fillmore,et al.
Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone
,
1988
.