Labeling of /s/ and /∫/ by Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing, Revisited

The two aims of this study were (a) to determine the perceptual weight given formant transition and relative amplitude information for labeling fricative place of articulation perception and (b) to...

[1]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[2]  T L Wiley,et al.  Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  J. Dubno,et al.  Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Perceptual integration of the murmur and formant transitions for place of articulation in nasal consonants. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic linguistics : essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged , 1987 .

[6]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Representation of speech-like sounds in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979 .

[7]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  C S Watson,et al.  Auditory psychophysics and perception. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  B. Repp.  Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in CV syllables. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S. Furui.  On the role of spectral transition for speech perception. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Walt Jesteadt.  Modeling sensorineural hearing loss , 1997 .

[13]  C S Watson,et al.  Signal duration and signal frequency in relation to auditory sesitivity. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B H Repp,et al.  On the possible role of auditory short-term adaptation in perception of the prevocalic [m]-[n] contrast. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Thomas H. Crystal,et al.  A note on the durations of fricatives in American English , 1988 .

[17]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. Feth,et al.  Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Tone detection and synthetic speech discrimination in band-reject noise by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Rosen,et al.  Individual variability in the perception of cues to place contrasts in initial stops , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  F. Zeng,et al.  Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  H. Winitz,et al.  The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[24]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Effect of relative and overall amplitude on perception of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[26]  K. Harris.  Cues for the Discrimination of American English Fricatives in Spoken Syllables , 1958 .

[27]  A. Jongman.  Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  L E Humes,et al.  Identification of multidimensional stimuli containing speech cues and the effects of training. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  C. Laeufer,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV , 1995 .

[30]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M. Younger,et al.  Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  M. Hedrick,et al.  Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  K. Stevens,et al.  Studies of Formant Transitions Using a Vocal Tract Analog , 1956 .

[34]  K. Grant,et al.  Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Joseph P. Olive,et al.  Acoustics of American English speech , 1993 .

[36]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  L. Humes,et al.  Identification of multidimensional complex sounds having parallel dimension structure. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  D W Massaro,et al.  Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  B. Moore.  Cochlear Hearing Loss , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[40]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Speech perception as pattern recognition. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  S. Nittrouer.  Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries , 1992 .

[43]  D. Massaro,et al.  Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  B. Moore.  Frequency Selectivity in Hearing , 1987 .

[45]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[46]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  D. Whalen,et al.  Perception of the English /s/–/∫/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices , 1991 .

[48]  R. Day,et al.  A note on apparent displacement of lines and dots on oblique parallels , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  R. Diehl,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values , 1995 .

[50]  K. Stevens,et al.  On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants , 1961 .