Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice

Design is key to our collective liberation, but most design processes today reproduce inequalities structured by what Black feminist scholars call the matrix of domination. Intersecting inequalities are manifest at all levels of the design process. This paper builds upon the Design Justice Principles, developed by an emerging network of designers and community organizers, to propose a working definition of design justice: Design justice is a field of theory and practice that is concerned with how the design of objects and systems influences the distribution of risks, harms, and benefits among various groups of people. Design justice focuses on the ways that design reproduces, is reproduced by, and/or challenges the matrix of domination (white supremacy, heteropatriarchy, capitalism, and settler colonialism). Design justice is also a growing social movement that aims to ensure a more equitable distribution of design’s benefits and burdens; fair and meaningful participation in design decisions; and recognition of community based design traditions, knowledge, and practices.

[1]  K. Crenshaw Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[2]  K. Crenshaw Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color , 1991 .

[3]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[4]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[5]  A. Davis Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment , 1993 .

[6]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[7]  J. Chamberlin,et al.  Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment , 1999 .

[8]  Mariarosa Dalla Costa,et al.  Women, development, and labor reproduction : struggles and movements , 1999 .

[9]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[10]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[11]  Alfinio Flores,et al.  Examining Disparities in Mathematics Education: Achievement Gap or Opportunity Gap? , 2007 .

[12]  M. Flanagan,et al.  Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice , 2008 .

[13]  C. Herring Does Diversity Pay?: Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity , 2009 .

[14]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[15]  Sasha Costanza-Chock Mic Check! Media Cultures and the Occupy Movement , 2012 .

[16]  Lilly C. Irani,et al.  Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship , 2015 .

[17]  Denise A. Segura,et al.  Stratification in the Labor Market , 2015 .

[18]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Design For The Real World , 2016 .

[19]  Kim A. Weeden,et al.  Long Work Hours, Part-Time Work, and Trends in the Gender Gap in Pay, the Motherhood Wage Penalty, and the Fatherhood Wage Premium , 2016, RSF.

[20]  G. Orfield,et al.  "Brown" at 62: School Segregation by Race, Poverty and State. , 2016 .

[21]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  Gender Equity in Computing: International Faculty Perceptions and Current Practices , 2016, ITiCSE-WGR.

[22]  Grant Potter,et al.  Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, A New Vision For The Future of Work and a Fairer Internet #bcoet #etug @etug @bccampus , 2016 .

[23]  Sasha Costanza-Chock,et al.  Toward transformative media organizing: LGBTQ and Two-Spirit media work in the United States , 2017 .

[24]  F. D. Wilson GENERATIONAL CHANGES IN RACIAL INEQUALITY IN OCCUPATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 1950–2010 , 2016, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race.

[25]  Ian P. McManus,et al.  Gender, crisis and the welfare state: Female labor market outcomes across OECD countries , 2018 .

[26]  D. Fitch,et al.  Review of "Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism," by Noble, S. U. (2018). New York, New York: NYU Press. , 2018, CDQR.

[27]  Virginia E. Eubanks Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018 .

[28]  Hannah Lebovits Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018, Public Integrity.