Virtual Testbed for Development, Test and Validation of Modular Satellites

The iBOSS project [1] (Intelligent Building Blocks for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Assembly) centers around two key elements: modules consisting of both, structural and functional elements, and a standardized 4-in-1 interface for docking, power, d ata and thermal interconnection. In this approach, the classical spacecraft subsystems are converted into specialized and standardized building blocks. These building blocks are then used to form a maintainabl e modular and reconfigurable spacecraft. In order to handle the technical complexity and bri ge the gap between technical and economical requirements and impact, all building blocks and al l derived satellites are first modeled and analyzed i n a comprehensive “Virtual Testbed iBOSS” (VTi). The VTi combines virtual reality and 3D simulation techniques, and covers all relevant aspects of on-o rbit assembly and operation. In this paper, we focus on the VTi and its overall concept as well as the various aspects covered by t he VTi. This incorporates rigid body dynamics, control algorithms for satellites, robotic servicing in dif ferent orbits, the simulation of thermal and energy aspect s as well as the simulation of the building blocks interfaces. Several reference scenarios, like satel lite and servicing simulation or hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) simulation that combine virtual satellites wi th physical building blocks, will illustrate the feasi bil ty of the VTi approach and its benefits for the iBOSS ecosystem.

[1]  Stefano Carpin,et al.  USARSim: a robot simulator for research and education , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Bernd Schäfer,et al.  Advanced testbed and simulation environment for planetary exploration and mobility investigations , 2010 .

[3]  R. Dillmann,et al.  An Intelligent Building Blocks Concept for On-Orbit-Satellite Servicing , 2012 .

[4]  Andreas Junghanns,et al.  Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The Standard for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models , 2012 .

[6]  Jeffrey C. Trinkle,et al.  An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with Coulomb friction , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[7]  Richard T. Vaughan,et al.  The Player/Stage Project: Tools for Multi-Robot and Distributed Sensor Systems , 2003 .

[8]  Eric Guiffo Kaigom,et al.  Supporting in physics-based eRobotics-testbeds the pervasive employment of intelligent robot manipulators , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS).

[9]  Johannes Helander,et al.  CONNECTING SENSORS AND ROBOTS THROUGH THE INTERNET BY INTEGRATING MICROSOFT ROBOTICS STUDIO AND EMBEDDED WEB SERVICES , 2007 .

[10]  Jorge Bardina,et al.  Intelligent launch and range operations virtual testbed (ILRO-VTB) , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Michael C. Nechyba,et al.  Rapid Development of Vision-Based Control for MAVs through a Virtual Flight Testbed , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  Modular robots for on-orbit satellite servicing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[13]  G. Sohl,et al.  Characterization of the ROAMS Simulation Environment for Testing Rover Mobility on Sloped Terrain , 2009 .

[14]  David Baraff,et al.  Linear-time dynamics using Lagrange multipliers , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  Bernd Schäfer,et al.  Verification and Validation Process on 3D Dynamics Simulation in Support of Planetary Rover Development , 2008 .

[16]  J. Baumgarte Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems , 1972 .

[17]  J. Roßmann,et al.  VALIDATING THE CAMERA AND LIGHT SIMULATION OF A VIRTUAL SPACE ROBOTICS TESTBED BY MEANS OF PHYSICAL MOCKUP DATA , 2012 .