Policy coherence and policy domains

Policy scholars generally agree that greater coherence of policies is desirable, but the concept is under-theorized and has received little empirical examination. This research examines the policy coherence of 18 policy domains and considers institutional factors that affect variation among them. There is considerable variation in coherence among substantive, regional, and identity-based policy domains. Greater degrees of policy coherence exist for policy domains that have dominant congressional committees or have more involvement of lead federal agencies. These findings extend what policy scholars know about policy subsystems in American policymaking to consideration of the coherence of policy domains.

[1]  B. Jones,et al.  Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress , 1995 .

[2]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[3]  An Empirical Examination of Innovations in Integrated Environmental Management: The Case of the Great Lakes Basin , 1996 .

[4]  Peter J. May,et al.  Policy Coherence and Component-Driven Policymaking: Arctic Policy in Canada and the United States , 2005 .

[5]  P. Burstein.  Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes , 1991 .

[6]  K. Bogenschneider,et al.  Has Family Policy Come of Age? A Decade Review of the State of U.S. Family Policy in the 1990s , 2000 .

[7]  Susan H. Fuhrman.  Clinton's Education Policy and Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s , 1994 .

[8]  Grant Jordan.  Bringing Policy Communities Back In? A Comment on Grant , 2005 .

[9]  Valerie Heitshusen.  Interest Group Lobbying and U.S. House Decentralization: Linking Informational Focus to Committee Hearing Appearances , 2000 .

[10]  Jack L. Walker,et al.  Interest Groups, Iron Triangles and Representative Institutions in American National Government , 1984, British Journal of Political Science.

[11]  S. Watson.  Holistic Policymaking: “Neo‐Liberalism” as Illustrated by the Women's and Disability Rights Movements , 1993 .

[12]  P. May.  Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[13]  B. Rabe,et al.  Beyond Environmental Regulatory Fragmentation: Signs of Integration in the Case of the Great Lakes Basin , 1995 .

[14]  Jeff Worsham.  Wavering Equilibriums , 1998 .

[15]  Lisa L. Miller.  Rethinking Bureaucrats in the Policy Process: Criminal Justice Agents and the National Crime Agenda , 2004 .

[16]  M. J. Wells.  The Grassroots Reconfiguration of U.S. Immigration Policy , 2004 .

[17]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989 , 2004 .

[18]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change , 2000 .

[19]  B. Woods,et al.  Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems: Analysis of Coalition Stability and Defection over Time , 1991 .

[20]  Julia Koschinsky,et al.  CONFRONTIN POLICY FRAGMENTATION: A POLITICAL APPROACH TO THE ROLE OF HOUSING NONPROFITS , 2001 .