AbstractThis paper describes the procedure recommended in two specific standards to define and quantify structural redundancy using a direct analysis of bridges. The procedure is illustrated using two typical bridge configurations. The first example is a simply-supported truss bridge superstructure. The second example is a continuous three-span two-girder steel box bridge. These examples are selected because these types of structures are generally considered to be fracture-critical nonredundant bridges. The object of analysis is to investigate the reserve strength redundancy of the structures, defined as their ability to continue to carry loads after the limiting strength of one member is reached. The analysis also investigates the loads that the structures could still carry after brittle damage to one of their members. The results of the analysis show that both structure types can provide adequate levels of redundancy for overloading, assuming that the bridge members have been designed to satisfy the app...
[1]
Jian Yang,et al.
Bridge System Safety and Redundancy
,
2014
.
[2]
Edwin Henry Gaylord,et al.
Structural Engineering Handbook
,
1968
.
[3]
Karl Barth,et al.
Assessment of redundancy protocols for short-span steel truss bridges
,
2014
.
[4]
Dennis Mertz.
Steel Bridge Design Handbook: Redundancy
,
2012
.
[5]
Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.
CALIBRATION OF LRFD BRIDGE CODE
,
1995
.
[6]
Robert J. Connor,et al.
Inspection and Management of Bridges with Fracture-Critical Details
,
2005
.
[7]
Michel Ghosn,et al.
REDUNDANCY IN HIGHWAY BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURES
,
1998
.
[8]
Karl H. Frank,et al.
Modeling the Response of Fracture Critical Steel Box-Girder Bridges
,
2010
.
[9]
Issam E. Harik,et al.
Structural Redundancy Evaluation of Steel Tub Girder Bridges
,
2012
.