Sensitivity Testing of the Newly Developed Elliptical Fitting Method for the Measurement of Convergence in Tunnels and Shafts

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has become more widely used in the geotechnical community as its number of applications increases. It has been shown to be useful in tunneling for applications such as rockmass characterization and discontinuity measurement. LiDAR data can also be used to measure deformation in tunnels, but before a comprehensive methodology can be developed, the accuracy issues associated with scanning must be fully understood. Once the accuracy issues associated with LiDAR are well understood, any analysis technique that uses LiDAR data must be tested to ensure that the determined accuracy issues have minimal impact on the results of the analysis. To prove the usefulness of the newly developed elliptical fitting method for the measurement of convergence in tunnels and shafts proposed by Delaloye et al. (Eurock 2012), a comprehensive analysis of accuracy issues associated with LiDAR scanning was conducted and then a sensitivity test of the convergence measurement technique was completed. The results of the analysis show that using the statistical techniques built into the elliptical fit analysis and LiDAR profile analysis, levels of real change (convergence), within the nominal level of random and systematic noise included in the data, can be measured with confidence. Furthermore, the new analysis is robust enough to handle large amounts of occlusion or missing perimeter coverage within data sets.

[1]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct least squares fitting of ellipses , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Automated rockmass discontinuity mapping from 3-dimensional surface data , 2013 .

[3]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Optimization of LiDAR scanning and processing for automated structural evaluation of discontinuities in rockmasses , 2009 .

[4]  D. Lichti,et al.  Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners , 2006 .

[5]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Geotechnical and operational applications for 3-dimensional laser scanning in drill and blast tunnels , 2010 .

[6]  Frank Lemy,et al.  A case study of monitoring tunnel wall displacement using laser scanning technology , 2009 .

[7]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Integration of three-dimensional laser scanning with discontinuum modelling for stability analysis of tunnels in blocky rockmasses , 2013 .

[8]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF A BORED TUNNEL BY MEANS OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2006 .

[9]  M. Kavvadas,et al.  Monitoring ground deformation in tunnelling: Current practice in transportation tunnels , 2005 .

[10]  Wulf Schubert The Development of the Observational Method , 2008 .

[11]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[12]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  T. Rabbani,et al.  Accuracy analysis of the Leica HDS3000 and feasibility of tunnel deformation monitoring , 2005 .

[14]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Using Terrestrial LiDAR For Tunnel Deformation Monitoring In Circular Tunnels And Shafts , 2012 .

[15]  S. Stiros,et al.  Mean deformation tensor and mean deformation ellipse of an excavated tunnel section , 2009 .

[16]  D. Lichti A RESOLUTION MEASURE FOR TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNERS , 2004 .

[17]  V. Kontogianni,et al.  TUNNEL MONITORING DURING THE EXCAVATION PHASE : 3-D KINEMATIC ANALYSIS BASED ON GEODETIC DATA , 2003 .