The Mediation of Policy Knowledge: An Interpretive Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems

We use structurating activity theory,an integration of structuration and cultural-historical activity theories, to examine how individuals construct policy knowledge.The study was conducted over 5 months with participants from related activity systems who interacted regarding special education policy. Qualitative analysis focused on how participants drew on system-specific and structural rules and resources to construct policy knowledge within and between activity systems. Results reveal how participants developed policy knowledge that was mediated by system elements of divisions of labor, communities, rules, subjects, and both material and symbolic mediating resources.The mediated knowledge construction process also reproduced broad structural features. Results interpreted through structurating activity theory extend current understandings of policy and knowledge processes and offer directions for future research.

[1]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[2]  Lorna Heaton,et al.  Knowledge Management and Professional Work , 2002 .

[3]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  The Impact of Communal Knowledge Repositories and People-Based Knowledge Management on Perceptions of Team Effectiveness , 2007 .

[4]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Innovation through knowledge codification , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[6]  Kathleen J. Krone,et al.  "The policy exists but you can't really use it": communication and the structuration of work-family policies , 2002 .

[7]  Dw Adams,et al.  Usable knowledge in public policy , 2004 .

[8]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[9]  Theo Wehner,et al.  Steps Across the Border – Cooperation, Knowledge Production and Systems Design , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  M. Mclaughlin.  Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[11]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[12]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Communication, discourse and activity , 1999 .

[13]  Mark B. Houston,et al.  Establishing a high-technology knowledge transfer network: The practical and symbolic roles of identification , 2008 .

[14]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[15]  P. Hall,et al.  POLICY AS THE TRANSFORMATION OF INTENTIONS: Producing Program From Statute , 1997 .

[16]  Stephane Tywoniak,et al.  Knowledge in Four Deformation Dimensions , 2007 .

[17]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks , 2000 .

[18]  Susan M. Barrett.  Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studies , 2004 .

[19]  S. Bell.  ‘Appropriate’ Policy Knowledge, and Institutional and Governance Implications , 2004 .

[20]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  Accomplishing Knowledge , 2008 .

[21]  Patrice M. Buzzanell,et al.  Struggling with Maternity Leave Policies and Practices: A Poststructuralist Feminist Analysis of Gendered Organizing , 2005 .

[22]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in the Organization , 1998 .

[23]  Gerardo Patriotta,et al.  Technology and The Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations , 2001 .

[24]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis , 2003 .

[25]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[26]  Patrice M. Buzzanell,et al.  “They Allowed”: Pentadic Mapping of Women's Maternity Leave Discourse as Organizational Rhetoric , 2008 .

[27]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice , 1993 .

[28]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Enriching activity theory without shortcuts , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[29]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research , 2002 .

[30]  J. O. Olufowote.  A Structurational Analysis of Informed Consent to Treatment: Societal Evolution, Contradiction, and Reproductions in Medical Practice , 2008, Health communication.

[31]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[32]  Vladimir A. Lektorsky,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Activity theory in a new era , 1999 .

[33]  V. V. Davydov.  Perspectives on activity theory: The content and unsolved problems of activity theory , 1999 .

[34]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .