Finding common weights based on the DM's preference information

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is basically a linear programming-based technique used for measuring the relative performance of organizational units, referred to as Decision Making Units (DMUs). The flexibility in selecting the weights in standard DEA models deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. Moreover, these weights are not suitable to measure the preferences of a decision maker (DM). For dealing with the first difficulty, the concept of common weights was proposed in the DEA literature. But, none of the common weights approaches address the second difficulty. This paper proposes an alternative approach that we term as ‘preference common weights’, which is both practical and intellectually consistent with the DEA philosophy. To do this, we introduce a multiple objective linear programming model in which objective functions are input/output variables subject to the constraints similar to the equations that define production possibility set of standard DEA models. Then by using the Zionts–Wallenius method, we can generate common weights as the DM's underlying value structure about objective functions.

[1]  S. Zionts,et al.  An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem , 1976 .

[2]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[3]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis , 1993 .

[8]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[9]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[10]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[12]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[13]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  D Giokas The use of goal programming and data envelopment analysis for estimating efficient marginal costs of outputs , 1997 .

[15]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[17]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[18]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .