Ascertaining the optimal myoelectric signal recording duration for pattern recognition based prostheses control

Introduction Electromyogram-based pattern recognition (EMG-PR) has been widely considered an essentially intuitive control method for multifunctional upper limb prostheses. A crucial aspect of the scheme is the EMG signal recording duration (SRD) from which requisite motor tasks are characterized per time, impacting the system’s overall performance. For instance, lengthy SRD inevitably introduces fatigue (that alters the muscle contraction patterns of specific limb motions) and may incur high computational costs in building the motion intent decoder, resulting in inadequate prosthetic control and controller delay in practical usage. Conversely, relatively shorter SRD may lead to reduced data collection durations that, among other advantages, allow for more convenient prosthesis recalibration protocols. Therefore, determining the optimal SRD required to characterize limb motion intents adequately that will aid intuitive PR-based control remains an open research question. Method This study systematically investigated the impact and generalizability of varying lengths of myoelectric SRD on the characterization of multiple classes of finger gestures. The investigation involved characterizing fifteen classes of finger gestures performed by eight normally limb subjects using various groups of EMG SRD including 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 s. Two different training strategies including Between SRD and Within-SRD were implemented across three popular machine learning classifiers and three time-domain features to investigate the impact of SRD on EMG-PR motion intent decoder. Result The between-SRD strategy results which is a reflection of the practical scenario showed that an SRD greater than 5 s but less than or equal to 10 s (>5 and < = 10 s) would be required to achieve decent average finger gesture decoding accuracy for all feature-classifier combinations. Notably, lengthier SRD would incur more acquisition and implementation time and vice-versa. In inclusion, the study’s findings provide insight and guidance into selecting appropriate SRD that would aid inadequate characterization of multiple classes of limb motion tasks in PR-based control schemes for multifunctional prostheses.

[1]  Zongxing Lu,et al.  Elements Influencing sEMG-Based Gesture Decoding: Muscle Fatigue, Forearm Angle and Acquisition Time , 2021, Sensors.

[2]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  A new strategy based on feature filtering technique for improving the real-time control performance of myoelectric prostheses , 2021, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[3]  Guanglin Li,et al.  A linearly extendible multi-artifact removal approach for improved upper extremity EEG-based motor imagery decoding. , 2021, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Contrast of multi-resolution analysis approach to transhumeral phantom motion decoding , 2021, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[5]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  Phantom motion intent decoding for transhumeral prosthesis control with fused neuromuscular and brain wave signals , 2021, IET Cyber-Systems and Robotics.

[6]  Francesca Cordella,et al.  Control Strategies and Performance Assessment of Upper-Limb TMR Prostheses: A Review , 2021, Sensors.

[7]  Lin Wang,et al.  Appropriate Feature Set and Window Parameters Selection for Efficient Motion Intent Characterization towards Intelligently Smart EMG-PR System , 2020, Symmetry.

[8]  Cengiz Tepe,et al.  Detection and Classification of Muscle Activation in EMG Data Acquired by Myo Armband , 2020 .

[9]  J. Fergason,et al.  Technological Advances in Prosthesis Design and Rehabilitation Following Upper Extremity Limb Loss , 2020, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[10]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  Towards resolving the co-existing impacts of multiple dynamic factors on the performance of EMG-pattern recognition based prostheses , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Real-Time EMG Based Pattern Recognition Control for Hand Prostheses: A Review on Existing Methods, Challenges and Future Implementation , 2019, Sensors.

[12]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  Intelligent EMG Pattern Recognition Control Method for Upper-Limb Multifunctional Prostheses: Advances, Current Challenges, and Future Prospects , 2019, IEEE Access.

[13]  Lin Wang,et al.  A Novel Time-Domain Descriptor for Improved Prediction of Upper Limb Movement Intent in EMG-PR System , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  John J. Soraghan,et al.  Study on Interaction Between Temporal and Spatial Information in Classification of EMG Signals for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  L. Wheaton Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Hui Wang,et al.  Pattern recognition of electromyography signals based on novel time domain features for amputees' limb motion classification , 2017, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  New developments in prosthetic arm systems , 2016, Orthopedic research and reviews.

[19]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  Improving the Performance Against Force Variation of EMG Controlled Multifunctional Upper-Limb Prostheses for Transradial Amputees , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  Effects of Long-Term Myoelectric Signals on Pattern Recognition , 2013, ICIRA.

[22]  Rami N. Khushaba,et al.  Electromyogram (EMG) feature reduction using Mutual Components Analysis for multifunction prosthetic fingers control , 2012, 2012 12th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV).

[23]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of the training set on the accuracy of surface EMG classification in dynamic contractions for the control of multifunction prostheses , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Dennis C. Tkach,et al.  Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  T. Kuiken,et al.  A Comparison of Pattern Recognition Control and Direct Control of a Multiple Degree-of-Freedom Transradial Prosthesis , 2016, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[30]  Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  A Learning Scheme for EMG Based Interfaces: On Task Specificity in Motion Decoding Domain , 2014 .

[31]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .