Leaf orientation and distribution in a Phaseolus vulgaris L. crop and their relation to light microclimate

Abstract Changes in canopy structure parameters (leaflet orientation, leaflet inclination and leaf area index) were measured in crops of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the field as the canopy developed between July and October. These changes were compared with the corresponding changes in seasonal light transmission. The beans showed clear heliotropic behaviour, with preferential orientation of leaflets towards the sun’s beam, especially on sunny days. Nevertheless a significant proportion of the leaves pointed in other directions, with as much as 20% oriented towards the north. The highest proportion of leaf inclinations was in the range 30–40° on cloudy days and between 40° and 50° on sunny days. Two methods were compared for assessing changes in light transmission: (a) the use of a Sunfleck Ceptometer and (b) the use of continuous records obtained with sensors installed in the canopy. Over the growth period studied, the total of the leaf plus stem area indices (LS) increased from 0.26 to 5.2 with the transmission coefficient (τ) for photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), obtained using the Ceptometer, correspondingly decreasing from 0.72 to 0.05, and the canopy extinction coefficient decreasing from 1.4 to 0.62. The continuous records of light transmission gave generally similar estimates of τ. Some contrasting leaf angle distribution functions were compared for estimation of LS from the light measurements. The best leaf angle function to predict LS from the observed light transmission was a conical function corrected by the degree of heliotropism.

[1]  H. Jones,et al.  Plants and Microclimate. , 1985 .

[2]  A. Lang.  Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies , 1986 .

[3]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Transient Light Measurements in Plant Canopies1 , 1969 .

[4]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Quantitative measures of leaf orientation and heliotropic response in sunflower, bean, pepper and cucumber , 1974 .

[5]  J. Welles,et al.  Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation , 1996 .

[6]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[7]  J. Monteith.  Light Interception and Radiative Exchange in Crop Stands , 1969 .

[8]  G. G. M. Millen,et al.  Leaf Angle: An Adaptive Feature of Sun and Shade Leaves , 1979, Botanical Gazette.

[9]  C. Varlet-Grancher,et al.  Crop Structure and Light Microclimate: Characterization and Applications , 1993 .

[10]  H. Jones,et al.  Stomatal responses to changing irradiance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. , 1994 .

[11]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: The description and measurement of plant canopy structure , 1989 .

[12]  F. Smith,et al.  Influence of canopy architecture on light penetration in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) forests , 1993 .

[13]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Description of leaf orientation and heliotropic response of sunflower using directional statistics , 1975 .

[14]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[15]  H. Mooney,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology-Field Methods and Instrumentation. , 1990 .

[16]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  A Model for Plant and Crop Growth, Allowing for Competition for Light by the use of Potential and Restricted Projected Crown Zone Areas , 1994 .

[17]  M. Monsi.  Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[18]  J. Norman,et al.  Crop structure and the penetration of direct sunlight , 1985 .

[19]  H. Jones,et al.  Responses of CO2 assimilation to changes in irradiance: laboratory and field data and a model for beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) , 1996 .

[20]  M. Gilabert,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect methods for measuring leaf and surface areas of individual bushes , 1995 .

[21]  G. Campbell.  Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution , 1986 .

[22]  D. Koller.  Light‐driven leaf movements* , 1990 .

[23]  A. Lang,et al.  Sunlit areas and angular distributions of sunflower leaves for plants in single and multiple rows , 1976 .

[24]  H. Jones,et al.  Sunfleck dynamics and canopy structure in a Phaseolus vulgaris L. canopy , 1998 .