Teacher change and ''high-stakes'' assessment: what happens to professional development? $

Abstract This study explored the impact of learning a new instructional practice in a US school district that places great value in a statewide student assessment. Grounded Theory methodology (Strauss & Corbin, 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) was used to analyze interview and observation data from 20 teachers undergoing professional development in a new reading strategy. We found that teaching in a “high-stakes” assessment environment impacts the implementation, fidelity, and sustainability of new teaching methods. Most importantly, our results suggest that some teachers may use “high-stakes” assessments as their primary reference point in which to gauge the merit of innovative teaching practices. Furthermore, decisions regarding which components to implement, how often to use these components, and what materials to utilize in their implementation may be influenced by the preparation for and expected results of these tests.

[1]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  What We Know About Using Research Findings , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Thomas M. Haladyna,et al.  Raising Standardized Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution , 1991 .

[3]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Designing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program [and] Technical Appendices. , 1999 .

[5]  D. Cohen.  Revolution in one classroom , 1990 .

[6]  J. Hiebert.  Relationships between research and the NCTM standards , 1999 .

[7]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[8]  W. Moore.  The Devaluation of Standardized Testing: One District's Response to a Mandated Assessment , 1994 .

[9]  B. Showers,et al.  Synthesis of Research on Staff Development: A Framework for Future Study and a State-of-the-Art Analysis. , 1987 .

[10]  D. Cohen.  A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier , 1990 .

[11]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Providing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. , 2003 .

[12]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[13]  T. Urdan,et al.  Teachers' Perceptions of Standardized Achievement Tests , 1994 .

[14]  Linda M. Mcneil.  CREATING NEW INEQUALITIES: CONTRADICTIONS OF REFORM , 2000 .

[15]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Reflections and Deflections of Policy: The Case of Carol Turner , 1990 .

[16]  Hilda Borko,et al.  Exploring and Supporting Teacher Change: Two Third-Grade Teachers' Experiences in a Mathematics and Literacy Staff Development Project , 2000, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  M. Smith.  Put to the Test: The Effects of External Testing on Teachers , 1991 .

[18]  P. Peterson.  The California Study of Elementary Mathematics , 1990 .

[19]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading during Social Studies in Heterogeneous Fourth-Grade Classrooms , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[21]  J. Klingner,et al.  Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition though Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) , 1999 .