The Influence of Ecological and Conventional Plant Production Systems on Soil Microbial Quality under Hops (Humulus lupulus)

The knowledge about microorganisms—activity and diversity under hop production is still limited. We assumed that, different systems of hop production (within the same soil and climatic conditions) significantly influence on the composition of soil microbial populations and its functional activity (metabolic potential). Therefore, we compared a set of soil microbial properties in the field experiment of two hop production systems (a) ecological based on the use of probiotic preparations and organic fertilization (b) conventional—with the use of chemical pesticides and mineral fertilizers. Soil analyses included following microbial properties: The total number microorganisms, a bunch of soil enzyme activities, the catabolic potential was also assessed following Biolog EcoPlates®. Moreover, the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) was characterized by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (T-RFLP) of PCR ammonia monooxygenase α-subunit (amoA) gene products. Conventional and ecological systems of hop production were able to affect soil microbial state in different seasonal manner. Favorable effect on soil microbial activity met under ecological, was more probably due to livestock-based manure and fermented plant extracts application. No negative influence on conventional hopyard soil was revealed. Both type of production fulfilled fertilizing demands. Under ecological production it was due to livestock-based manure fertilizers and fermented plant extracts application.

[1]  L. F. Elliott,et al.  Microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. , 1992 .

[2]  W. Horwath,et al.  Combining fertilizer and organic inputs to synchronize N supply in alternative cropping systems in California , 2002 .

[3]  J. Tarafdar,et al.  Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and its relation to the depletion of soil organic phosphorus , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[4]  G. Tyler,et al.  Heavy metal pollution and decomposition of spruce needle litter , 1973 .

[5]  J. Bloem,et al.  Microbial diversity, nitrogen loss and grass production after addition of Effective Micro-organisms® (EM) to slurry manure , 2006 .

[6]  H. Insam,et al.  Long‐term effects of compost amendment of soil on functional and structural diversity and microbial activity , 2006 .

[7]  J. M. Bremner,et al.  Assay of urease activity in soils , 1972 .

[8]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Microbial diversity and soil functions , 2003 .

[9]  A. Guckert,et al.  Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere , 2003 .

[10]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry , 1996 .

[11]  A. Mills,et al.  Classification and Characterization of Heterotrophic Microbial Communities on the Basis of Patterns of Community-Level Sole-Carbon-Source Utilization , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  Plant Pathophysiology.  Fungi isolated from soil before the seeding and after harvest of pea (Pisum sativum L.) after application of bio-control product EM 1 , 2007 .

[13]  J. M. Bremner,et al.  Stability of urease in soils , 1977 .

[14]  M. Schloter,et al.  Functional diversity of soil organisms: a review of recent research activities in Germany , 2002 .

[15]  Jeremy D. Wilson,et al.  Does organic farming benefit biodiversity , 2005 .

[16]  S. Macnaughton,et al.  Effect of Toxic Metals on Indigenous Soil β-Subgroup Proteobacterium Ammonia Oxidizer Community Structure and Protection against Toxicity by Inoculated Metal-Resistant Bacteria , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  A. Siczek,et al.  Soil microbial activity as influenced by compaction and straw mulching , 2012 .

[18]  A. Okorski,et al.  Fungi isolated from soil before the seeding and after harvest of pea (Pisum sativum L.) after application of bio-control product EM 1 TM , 2012 .

[19]  Peter Simonson,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Organic Hop Production in the United States , 2011 .

[20]  T. Urich,et al.  Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils , 2006, Nature.

[21]  H. Insam,et al.  16S rDNA analysis reveals low microbial diversity in community level physiological profile assays. , 2008, Journal of microbiological methods.

[22]  F. Eivazi,et al.  Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils , 1988 .

[23]  J. Trevors,et al.  Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. , 2004, Journal of microbiological methods.

[24]  H. Insam.  A New Set of Substrates Proposed for Community Characterization in Environmental Samples , 1997 .

[25]  Abdul Rochim . A.Ma.Pust.  Effective Microorganisms (EM) , 2014 .

[26]  S. Cocco,et al.  Characteristics of rhizosphere soil from natural and agricultural environments , 2005 .

[27]  E. Topp.  Bacteria in agricultural soils: Diversity, role and future perspectives , 2003 .

[28]  Shobha Sharma,et al.  Functional diversity of soil bacterial communities increases after maize litter amendment , 1998 .

[29]  F. Widmer,et al.  How effective are 'effective microorganisms® (EM)'? Results from a field study in temperate climate. , 2010 .

[30]  Jerzy Lipiec,et al.  Community Level Physiological Profiles (CLPP), Characterization and Microbial Activity of Soil Amended with Dairy Sewage Sludge , 2012, Sensors.

[31]  J. Ladd,et al.  Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates , 1972 .

[32]  R. Burns,et al.  Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques , 2002 .

[33]  M. Burger,et al.  Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems , 2003 .

[34]  P. Marschner.  Plant-Microbe Interactions in the Rhizosphere and Nutrient Cycling , 2007 .

[35]  T. Müller,et al.  Impact of effective microorganisms and other biofertilizers on soil microbial characteristics, organic-matter decomposition, and plant growth. , 2009 .

[36]  A. Gajda,et al.  Microbiological and biochemical properties of soils under cereals grown in the ecological, conventional and integrated system , 2001 .

[37]  Józef Horabik,et al.  Encyclopedia of agrophysics , 2011 .