Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation

Smart farming (also referred to as digital farming, digital agriculture and precision agriculture) has largely been driven by productivity and efficiency aims, but there is an increasing awareness of potential socio-ethical challenges. The responsible research and innovation (RRI) approach aims to address such challenges but has had limited application in smart farming contexts. Using smart dairying research and development (R&D) in New Zealand (NZ) as a case study, we examine the extent to which principles of RRI have been applied in NZ smart dairying development and assess the broader lessons for RRI application in smart farming. We draw on insights from: a review of research on dairy technology use in NZ; interviews with smart dairying stakeholders; and the application of an analytical framework based on RRI dimensions. We conclude that smart dairying R&D and innovation activities have focused on technology development and on-farm use without considering socio-ethical implications and have excluded certain actors such as citizens and consumers. This indicates that readiness to enact RRI in this context is not yet optimal, and future RRI efforts require leadership by government or dairy sector organisations to fully embed RRI principles in the guidelines for large R&D project design (what has also been referred to as ‘RRI maturity’). More broadly, enacting RRI in smart farming requires initial identification of RRI readiness in a given sector or country and devising a roadmap and coherent project portfolio to support capacity building for enacting RRI. Additionally, methods (such as RRI indicators) for operationalising RRI must be adapted to the context of the national or sectoral innovation system in which smart farming is being developed.

[1]  Wolfgang Bokelmann,et al.  Analysis of animal monitoring technologies in Germany from an innovation system perspective , 2015 .

[2]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics , 2016 .

[3]  K. Betteridge,et al.  The effects of temporal and environmental factors on the urination behaviour of dairy cows using tracking and sensor technologies , 2016, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Responsible to whom? Seed innovations and the corporatization of agriculture , 2015 .

[5]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA) , 2006 .

[6]  D. Guston Giving content to responsible innovation , 2014 .

[7]  Christina Umstatter,et al.  Review: The evolution of virtual fences: A review , 2011 .

[8]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Is precision livestock farming an engineer's daydream or nightmare, an animal's friend or foe, and a farmer's panacea or pitfall? , 2008 .

[9]  W. Wales,et al.  Challenges of feeding dairy cows in Australia and New Zealand , 2017 .

[10]  B. Boogaard,et al.  Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity , 2011 .

[11]  J. Jago,et al.  Evaluating rates of technology adoption and milking practices on New Zealand dairy farms , 2015 .

[12]  Mairi Jay,et al.  The political economy of a productivist agriculture: New Zealand dairy discourses , 2007 .

[13]  C. Saunders,et al.  The Land and the brand , 2016 .

[14]  Paine,et al.  Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia , 2012 .

[15]  Kyle Powys Whyte,et al.  Collingridge's dilemma and the early ethical assessment of emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology enabled biosensors , 2017 .

[16]  Ruth Nettle,et al.  Doing integration in catchment management research: Insights into a dynamic learning process , 2015 .

[17]  T. Grandin Animal welfare and society concerns finding the missing link. , 2014, Meat science.

[18]  D. Weary,et al.  Imagining the ideal dairy farm. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  V. Blok,et al.  The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation , 2015 .

[21]  G. Doole,et al.  Trade-offs between profit, production, and environmental footprint on pasture-based dairy farms in the Waikato region of New Zealand , 2015 .

[22]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Broken promises and breaking ground for responsible innovation – intervention research to transform business-as-usual in nanotechnology innovation , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[23]  S. Ledgard,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of high and low intensification pasture-based milk production systems: A case study of the Waikato region, New Zealand , 2017 .

[24]  C. R. Eastwood,et al.  Using a ‘network of practice’ approach to match grazing decision-support system design with farmer practice , 2017 .

[26]  Christopher Bear,et al.  Robotic milking technologies and renegotiating situated ethical relationships on UK dairy farms , 2014 .

[27]  Melanie Bryant,et al.  Ordering adoption: Materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies , 2017 .

[28]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice , 2017 .

[29]  Nancy Alonistioti,et al.  Farm management systems and the Future Internet era , 2012 .

[30]  J. M. Bos,et al.  Digitalisering van dieren : Verkenning Precision Livestock Farming , 2016 .

[31]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[32]  J. Yeates How Good? Ethical Criteria for a ‘Good Life’ for Farm Animals , 2017 .

[33]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Scenario analysis to determine possible, plausible futures for the New Zealand dairy industry , 2017 .

[34]  John Ballingall,et al.  Dairy trade’s economic contribution to New Zealand , 2017 .

[35]  P. Osseweijer,et al.  Trustworthiness and Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Bio-Economy , 2015 .

[36]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Enhancing the Reflexivity of System Innovation Projects With System Analyses , 2010 .

[37]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social Studies of Science.

[38]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Questioning Big Data: Crowdsourcing crisis data towards an inclusive humanitarian response , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[39]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation , 2014 .

[40]  Rupert S. Tipples,et al.  The dairy farming population and migrations , 2005 .

[41]  K. Bright,et al.  Automatic dairy farming in New Zealand using extensive grazing systems. , 2004 .

[42]  Ian J. Yule,et al.  precision dairy farming in Australasia: adoption, risks and opportunities , 2013 .

[43]  M. Carolan Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co-Experimental Techniques of Addition , 2017 .

[44]  V. Blok,et al.  Moral “Lock-In” in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives , 2015 .

[45]  D. Weary,et al.  Public concerns about dairy-cow welfare: how should the industry respond? , 2017 .

[46]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review , 2016, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[47]  Daphné Carthy,et al.  A Practical Approach to the Integration of Responsible Innovation through Design Thinking , 2015 .

[48]  L. Holloway,et al.  Technology and Restructuring the Social Field of Dairy Farming: Hybrid Capitals, ‘Stockmanship’ and Automatic Milking Systems , 2016 .

[49]  P. Macnaghten Responsible innovation and the reshaping of existing technological trajectories: the hard case of genetically modified crops , 2016 .

[50]  S. Wolf,et al.  Precision farming: environmental legitimation, commodification of information, and industrial coordination , 2010 .

[51]  J. Bewley,et al.  An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[52]  P.L.M. Seuneke,et al.  Replication and translation of co-innovation: The influence of institutional context in large international participatory research projects , 2017 .

[53]  T. Hellström,et al.  Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation , 2003 .

[54]  S. Wolfert,et al.  Big Data in Smart Farming – A review , 2017 .

[55]  B. Stahl,et al.  Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies On the implementation of responsible research and innovation , 2016 .

[56]  D. Weary,et al.  What Difference Does a Visit Make? Changes in Animal Welfare Perceptions after Interested Citizens Tour a Dairy Farm , 2016, PloS one.

[57]  Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo,et al.  Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities , 2014 .

[58]  Isabelle Carbonell,et al.  The Ethics of Big Data in Big Agriculture , 2016 .

[59]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[60]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: learning from transdisciplinarity , 2014 .

[61]  C Kamphuis,et al.  Field validation of protocols developed to evaluate in-line mastitis detection systems. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[62]  C. Lokhorst,et al.  Livestock Farming with Care: towards sustainable production of animal-source food , 2013 .

[63]  Vincent Blok,et al.  Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices , 2015 .

[64]  M. H. Cooper,et al.  Building ‘cowshed cultures’: A cultural perspective on the promotion of stockmanship and animal welfare on dairy farms , 2012 .

[65]  B. Skorupinski Putting Precaution to Debate – about the Precautionary Principle and Participatory Technology Assessment , 2002 .

[66]  A. P. Bos,et al.  Reflexive Interactive Design and its Application in a Project on Sustainable Dairy Husbandry Systems , 2009 .

[67]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? , 2017 .

[68]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry: The Case for Corporate Responsibility Tools , 2015 .

[69]  C. R. Eastwood,et al.  Getting the most out of advanced farm management technologies: roles of technology suppliers and dairy industry organisations in supporting precision dairy farmers , 2015 .

[70]  Diana Stuart,et al.  Diversity in agricultural technology adoption: How are automatic milking systems used and to what end? , 2015 .

[71]  S. Andrade,et al.  Farmers Under Pressure. Analysis of the Social Conditions of Cases of Animal Neglect , 2014 .

[72]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Big Data in food and agriculture , 2016 .

[73]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[74]  R. Kolbach,et al.  Application note: Attachment accuracy of a novel prototype robotic rotary and investigation of two management strategies for incomplete milked quarters , 2012 .

[75]  L.F.M. Heutinck,et al.  Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms , 2015 .

[76]  Yeong Sheng Tey,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a review for policy implications , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[77]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review , 2016, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[78]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Design process outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects; functions and limitations , 2012 .

[79]  Sjaak Wolfert,et al.  A Future Internet Collaboration Platform for Safe and Healthy Food from Farm to Fork , 2014, 2014 Annual SRII Global Conference.

[80]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme , 2013 .

[81]  C. Eastwood,et al.  Individualised feeding of concentrate supplement in pasture-based dairy systems: practices and perceptions of New Zealand dairy farmers and their advisors , 2017 .

[82]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[83]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies , 2017 .

[84]  Responsible innovation in industry: a cautionary note on corporate social responsibility , 2016 .