Intrinsicf0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners

We explore how listeners perceive distinct pieces of phonetic information that are conveyed in parallel by the fundamental frequency (f0) contour of spoken and sung vowels. In a first experiment, we measured differences inf0 of /i/ and /a/ vowels spoken and sung by unselected undergraduate participants. Differences in “intrinsicf0” (withf0 of /i/ higher than of /a/) were present in spoken and sung vowels; however, differences in sung vowels were smaller than those in spoken vowels. Four experiments tested a hypothesis that listeners would not hear the intrinsicf0 differences as differences in pitch on the vowel, because they provide information, instead, for production of a closed or open vowel. The experiments provide clear evidence of “parsing” of intrinsicf0 from thef0 that contributes to perceived vowel pitch. However, only some conditions led to an estimate of the magnitude of parsing that closely matched the magnitude of produced intrinsicf0 differences.

[1]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Perceiving the causes of coarticulatory acoustic variation: Consonant voicing and vowel pitch , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  C A Fowler,et al.  Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R L Diehl,et al.  The Role of Phonetics within the Study of Language , 1991, Phonetica.

[4]  J. G. Martin,et al.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  Vowel Intrinsic Pitch in Connected Speech , 1984 .

[6]  E Fischer-Jørgensen,et al.  Intrinsic F₀ in Tense and Lax Vowels with Special Reference to German , 1990, Phonetica.

[7]  C. Best The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. , 1994 .

[8]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[9]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[10]  D H Whalen,et al.  Intrinsic F0 of vowels in the babbling of 6-, 9-, and 12-month-old French- and English-learning infants. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C. Fowler Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Jean-Marie Humbert,et al.  Consonant Types, Vowel Quality, and Tone , 1978 .

[13]  N Dyhr,et al.  The Activity of the Cricothyroid Muscle and the Intrinsic Fundamental Frequency in Danish Vowels , 1990, Phonetica.

[14]  S. Sapir The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations , 1989 .

[15]  C A Fowler,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  N. R. Petersen Perceptual Compensation for Segmentally Conditioned Fundamental Frequency Perturbation , 1986 .

[17]  D. Whalen,et al.  The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1995 .

[18]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. , 1994 .

[19]  D. Whalen Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Erkki Vilkman,et al.  Articulatory hyoid-laryngeal changes vs. cricothyroid muscle activity in the control of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1989 .

[21]  J Sundberg,et al.  Articulatory Fo perturbations and auditory feedback. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.