Characteristics of asbestiform and non-asbestiform calcic amphiboles

Abstract In terms of morphology there are four major types of calcic amphibole; massive, prismatic, finely acicular and asbestos. Representatives of each of these types have been examined by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and electron probe microanalysis. Massive specimens (nephrite) consist of randomly oriented clusters of fine, roughly lath-shaped, sub-microscopic crystals; within each cluster the lath lengths (z) are approximately aligned but neighbouring laths are rotated with respect to one another. Finely acicular specimens (“byssolites”) have well-formed crystals bounded mainly by {110} (100) and (010) faces and characteristically have striations parallel to their lengths. Asbestiform varieties range from finer (flexible) to coarser (more brittle) specimens and many specimens contain a mixture of fine and coarse fibrils. The fibrils in a bundle are aligned parallel to z but are in a range of azimuthal orientations. It is inferred that they are formed by multiple independent nucleation and growth parallel to z rather than through parting or cleavage on {110} planes. (100) defect or twin planes, or on (010) planar defects. The {110} cleavage in amphiboles is well reported but (100) features are rarely mentioned in the literature. Our observations reveal the importance of (100) as a cleavage or parting as well as the tendency in nephrites, byssolites and asbestos towards a lath-like (parallel to z) morphology with flattening on (100). In the latter varieties therefore, the y-direction is that of second fastest crystal growth, after z. When subjected to moderate grinding, the comminution of asbestos fibres proceeds more by separation of fibrils and less by fracturing to shorter lengths as compared with prismatic and byssolite specimens. Prolonged grinding does, however, shorten lengths of even the least brittle asbestos. Transmission electron microscopy revealed extensive sub-grain boundaries and dislocation networks (suggesting a deformation history) in all prismatic and nephrite specimens. Fine multiple (100) twinning was observed in asbestos but not in other varieties. Although chain-width defects [on (010)], with visibility enhanced by beam damage, were most abundant in nephrites and fibrous tremolites, there appears to be no completely consistent relationship between such features and morphological type. Electron probe analyses showed that specimens that contain more than a very small amount of aluminium do not have asbestiform habit. Asbestos specimens also have lower contents of Mn, Na and K and have formulae closer to the ideal Ca2(Mg,Fe)5Si8O22(OH)2. Small departures from this in asbestos involve Na in the A site compensated by Na for Ca rather than Al for Si whereas the reverse is true in byssolites. Chemical substitutions in prismatic specimens are much less constrained. The characteristics of the four morphological sub-groups correlate reasonably well with what is known of their geological environments.

[1]  E. Whittaker The crystal chemistry of the amphiboles , 1960 .

[2]  F. Hawthorne Crystal chemistry of the amphiboles , 1981 .

[3]  J. Zussman,et al.  An investigation of nephrite jade by electron microscopy , 1985, Mineralogical Magazine.

[4]  G. W. Devore Crystal Growth and the Distribution of Elements , 1955, The Journal of Geology.

[5]  D. Crawford Electron microscopy applied to studies of the biological significance of defects in crocidolite asbestos , 1980, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  J. Hutchison,et al.  High-resolution electron microscopy and diffraction studies of fibrous amphiboles , 1975 .

[7]  A. Wylie OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FIBROUS AMPHIBOLES * , 1979 .

[8]  G. W. Devore The Association of Strongly Polarizing Cations with Weakly Polarizing Cations as a Major Influence in Element Distribution, Mineral Composition, and Crystal Growth , 1957, The Journal of Geology.

[9]  A. C. Dunham,et al.  Accuracy, precision and detection limits of energy‐dispersive electron‐microprobe analyses of silicates , 1978 .

[10]  J. Chisholm Planar defects in fibrous amphiboles , 1973 .

[11]  B. Leake,et al.  Nomenclature of Amphiboles , 1978, Mineralogical Magazine.

[12]  G. Brindley,et al.  A Structural Study of Talc and Talc-Tremolite Relations , 1960 .

[13]  W. T. Harry Aluminium Replacing Silicon in Some Silicate Lattices , 1950 .

[14]  V. Sobolev,et al.  Paragenetic types of calciferous amphiboles of metamorphic rocks , 1969 .

[15]  David R. Veblen Anthophyllite asbestos: microstructures, intergrown sheet silicates, and mechanisms of fiber formation , 1980 .

[16]  A. Ardell,et al.  Deformation Structures in Minerals , 1976 .

[17]  J. Papike,et al.  The crystal structure and cation distribution of glaucophane , 1968 .

[18]  B. Leake A catalog of analyzed calciferous and subcalciferous amphiboles together with their nomenclature and associated minerals , 1968 .

[19]  J. Zussman,et al.  Zincian actinolite asbestos , 1984 .