Implementing Evaluation of the Measurement Process in an Automotive Manufacturer: a Case Study

Reducing process variability is presently an area of much interest in manufacturing organizations. Programmes such as Six Sigma robustly link the financial performance of the organization to the degree of variability present in the processes and products of the organization. Data, and hence measurement processes, play an important part in driving such programmes and in making key manufacturing decisions. In many organizations, however, little thought is given to the quality of the data generated by such measurement processes. By using potentially flawed data in making fundamental manufacturing decisions, the quality of the decision-making process is undermined and, potentially, significant costs are incurred. Research in this area is sparse and has concentrated on the technicalities of the methodologies available to assess measurement process capability. Little work has been done on how to operationalize such activities to give maximum benefit. From the perspective of one automotive company, this paper briefly reviews the approaches presently available to assess the quality of data and develops a practical approach, which is based on an existing technical methodology and incorporates simple continuous improvement tools within a framework which facilitates appropriate improvement actions for each process assessed. A case study demonstrates the framework and shows it to be sound, generalizable and highly supportive of continuous improvement goals.

[1]  David Hoyle QS-9000 Quality Systems Handbook , 1993 .

[2]  W. Shewhart The Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. , 1932 .

[3]  A. N. Shuaib,et al.  On process capability and product tolerancing as affected by measuring device , 1995 .

[4]  W. Warner Burke,et al.  Understanding the management of change , 1996 .

[5]  Rjmm Ronald Does,et al.  A framework for implementation of statistical process control , 1997 .

[6]  Joseph Moses Juran Juran on planning for quality , 1988 .

[7]  G Knowles,et al.  A practical methodology for analysing and improving the measurement system. , 2000, Quality assurance.

[8]  J Antony,et al.  Gauge Capability Analysis: classical versus ANOVA. , 1999, Quality assurance.

[9]  V Leutgeb,et al.  Planning for Quality , 1991, Journal of quality assurance : a publication of the National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals.

[10]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance , 2000 .

[11]  Charles P Quesenberry SPC methods for quality improvement , 1997 .

[12]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[13]  P. D. T. O'Connor,et al.  Evaluating the Measurement Process (2nd edn). D. J. Wheeler and R. J. Lyday, Addison-Wesley, 1990. Number of pages: 106. Price: £18.95 , 1990 .

[14]  Albert Weckenmann,et al.  Acceptance of processes: do we need decision rules? , 2000 .

[15]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Key ingredients for the effective implementation of statistical process control , 2000 .