Type-1 OWA operators in aggregating multiple sources of uncertain information: properties and real world applications

The type-1 ordered weighted averaging (T1OWA) operator has demonstrated the capacity for directly aggregating multiple sources of linguistic information modelled by fuzzy sets rather than crisp values. Yager's OWA operators possess the properties of idempotence, monotonicity, compensativeness, and commutativity. This paper aims to address whether or not T1OWA operators possess these properties when the inputs and associated weights are fuzzy sets instead of crisp numbers. To this end, a partially ordered relation of fuzzy sets is defined based on the fuzzy maximum (join) and fuzzy minimum (meet) operators of fuzzy sets, and an alpha-equivalently-ordered relation of groups of fuzzy sets is proposed. Moreover, as the extension of orness and andness of an Yager's OWA operator, joinness and meetness of a T1OWA operator are formalised, respectively. Then, based on these concepts and the Representation Theorem of T1OWA operators, we prove that T1OWA operators hold the same properties as Yager's OWA operators possess, i.e.: idempotence, monotonicity, compensativeness, and commutativity. Various numerical examples and a case study of diabetes diagnosis are provided to validate the theoretical analyses of these properties in aggregating multiple sources of uncertain information and improving integrated diagnosis, respectively.

[1]  Dongrui Wu,et al.  Ordered Novel Weighted Averages , 2018 .

[2]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Type-1 OWA operators for aggregating uncertain information with uncertain weights induced by type-2 linguistic quantifiers , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Alpha-Level Aggregation: A Practical Approach to Type-1 OWA Operation for Aggregating Uncertain Information with Applications to Breast Cancer Treatments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Type-1 OWA methodology to consensus reaching processes in multi-granular linguistic contexts , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  Nonstationary Fuzzy Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[7]  Yuanli Cai,et al.  An opposite direction searching algorithm for calculating the type-1 ordered weighted average , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[8]  Nikhil R. Pal,et al.  A New Family of OWA Operators Featuring Constant Orness , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[9]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  Uncertain Fuzzy Reasoning: A Case Study in Modelling Expert Decision Making , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  D. Hong,et al.  The General Least Square Deviation OWA Operator Problem , 2019, Mathematics.

[11]  Nesma Settouti,et al.  Generating fuzzy rules for constructing interpretable classifier of diabetes disease , 2012, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[12]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[13]  James M. Keller,et al.  An α-Level OWA Implementation of Bounded Rationality for Fuzzy Route Selection , 2013, WCSC.

[14]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  On Constructing Parsimonious Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems via Influential Rule Selection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[16]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Aggregation Using the Fuzzy Weighted Average as Computed by the Karnik–Mendel Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  J. Ramík,et al.  Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization , 1985 .

[18]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Type‐1 OWA Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology: Application to Eurobonds Credit Risk Evaluation , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..