Scale‐dependent relationships between soil organic carbon and urease activity

Summary Many soil properties and processes vary at different spatial scales. As a result, relationships between soil properties often depend on scale. In this paper we show this for two soil properties of biological importance, by means of a nested analysis of covariance. The variables were urease activity (UA) and soil organic carbon (SOC), sampled on an unbalanced nested design at three sites with different land uses (arable, forest and pasture). The objective of this study was to investigate the scale-dependent relationships of UA and SOC at these three sites to exemplify the phenomenon of scale-dependency in the covariation of biogeochemical variables. At each site the variables showed different scale dependencies, expressed in their correlations at different scales. At the pasture site, UA and SOC were uncorrelated at all scales in the sampling design (0.2 m, 1 m, 6 m and ≥15 m), and the overall product moment correlation was 0.10. A significant positive scale dependent correlation (0.65) was found at the 1-m scale for the forested site. The soil properties were not spatially correlated at any of the other scales and the associated product moment correlation for this site was 0.14. Urease activity and soil organic C were found not to be correlated at the shorter scales in the arable site. However, significant positive correlation coefficients of 0.89 and 0.82 were obtained at the longer scales of 6 and ≥15-m respectively for the arable site. The product moment correlation at this site was 0.65. At both the arable and forest site, we found that correlations at particular scales were stronger than the overall product moment correlation. This approach allowed us to identify significant relationships between urease activity and soil organic carbon and the scales at which these relationships occur and to draw conclusions about the spatial scales, which must be resolved in further studies of these variables in these contrasting environments. This study highlights the pervasive effect of scale in soil biogeochemistry and shows that scale-dependence must not be disregarded by soil scientists in their investigations of biogeochemical processes.

[1]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Exploring scale‐dependent correlation of soil properties by nested sampling , 2005 .

[2]  Richard Webster,et al.  Analysing soil variation in two dimensions with the discrete wavelet transform , 2004 .

[3]  M. J. Pringle,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Model Error, Illustrated by Soil Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2006 .

[4]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[5]  J. Millette,et al.  Spatial dependence of soil enzyme activities along a slope , 1998 .

[6]  R. Webster,et al.  Coregionalization of trace metals in the soil in the Swiss Jura , 1994 .

[7]  R. Burns,et al.  Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques , 2002 .

[8]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: A model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition , 1994 .

[9]  Alice E. Milne,et al.  Scale‐ and location‐dependent correlation of nitrous oxide emissions with soil properties: an analysis using wavelets , 2004 .

[10]  Richard Webster,et al.  Soil classification and survey studies at Ginninderra , 1976 .

[11]  B. Ceccanti,et al.  Spatial variability of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil , 1991 .

[12]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[13]  John C. Gower.  Variance component estimation for unbalanced hierarchical classifications , 1962 .

[14]  C. Frampton,et al.  Gross nitrogen mineralization and nitrification rates and their relationships to enzyme activities and the soil microbial biomass in soils treated with dairy shed effluent and ammonium fertilizer at different water potentials , 1999, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[15]  M. Aon,et al.  II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil , 2001 .

[16]  P. Gioacchini,et al.  Activity and stability of urease-hydroxyapatite and urease-hydroxyapatite-humic acid complexes , 2003, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[17]  J. M. Bremner,et al.  Regulation of urease production in soil by microbial assimilation of nitrogen , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[18]  Kurt Christian Kersebaum,et al.  How representatively can we sample soil mineral nitrogen , 2006 .

[19]  R. Schulin,et al.  Spatial variation of urease activity measured in soil monitoring , 1996 .

[20]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Scale-dependent correlation between topsoil copper and cobalt concentrations in Scotland , 1994 .

[21]  R. J. Wagenet,et al.  Scale issues in agroecological research chains , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[22]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices , 1978 .

[23]  M. Tabatabai,et al.  Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils , 1999 .

[24]  T. W. Speir,et al.  Spatial variability of biochemical properties in a taxonomically-uniform soil under grazed pasture , 1984 .

[25]  A. T. Miesch.  Variograms and Variance Components in Geochemistry and Ore Evaluation , 1975 .