Prolegomenon to patterns in evolution

Despite Darwin, we remain children of Newton and dream of a grand theory that is epistemologically complete and would allow prediction of the evolution of the biosphere. The main purpose of this article is to show that this dream is false, and bears on studying patterns of evolution. To do so, I must justify the use of the word "function" in biology, when physics has only happenings. The concept of "function" lifts biology irreducibly above physics, for as we shall see, we cannot prestate the ever new biological functions that arise and constitute the very phase space of evolution. Hence, we cannot mathematize the detailed becoming of the biosphere, nor write differential equations for functional variables we do not know ahead of time, nor integrate those equations, so no laws "entail" evolution. The dream of a grand theory fails. In place of entailing laws, I propose a post-entailing law explanatory framework in which Actuals arise in evolution that constitute new boundary conditions that are enabling constraints that create new, typically unprestatable, adjacent possible opportunities for further evolution, in which new Actuals arise, in a persistent becoming. Evolution flows into a typically unprestatable succession of adjacent possibles. Given the concept of function, the concept of functional closure of an organism making a living in its world becomes central. Implications for patterns in evolution include historical reconstruction, and statistical laws such as the distribution of extinction events, or species per genus, and the use of formal cause, not efficient cause, laws.

[1]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Cellular Homeostasis, Epigenesis and Replication in Randomly Aggregated Macromolecular Systems , 1971 .

[2]  Michael L. Manapat,et al.  Spontaneous network formation among cooperative RNA replicators , 2012, Nature.

[3]  John Field,et al.  ‘Bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ , 1999 .

[4]  P. Regal,et al.  The Evolutionary Origin of Feathers , 1975, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  R. J. Wilson,et al.  Which came first, the lung or the breath? , 2001, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[6]  Steven Weinberg,et al.  Dreams of a Final Theory , 1993 .

[7]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Phase transition in random catalytic networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality , 2013 .

[9]  S. Kauffman.  Autocatalytic sets of proteins. , 1986 .

[10]  Giuseppe Longo,et al.  No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere , 2012, GECCO '12.

[11]  Wim Hordijk,et al.  The Structure of Autocatalytic Sets: Evolvability, Enablement, and Emergence , 2012, Acta biotheoretica.

[12]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[13]  Leonardo Bich.  Biological Autonomy and Systemic Integration , 2010 .

[14]  Zehavit Dadon,et al.  Building Logic into Peptide Networks: Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down , 2011 .

[15]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Function, anticipation, representation , 2001 .

[16]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality: Economic Opportunity and Evolution , 2014 .

[17]  Thomas Nagel,et al.  Mind and Cosmos , 2012 .

[18]  R. Lewontin.  Evolution and the theory of games. , 1961, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models , 2008, Biosyst..

[20]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[21]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Self-Sustained Replication of an RNA Enzyme , 2009, Science.

[22]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Towards a physics of evolution: critical diversity dynamics at the edges of collapse and bursts of diversification. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.