Resting-state brain activity can predict target-independent aptitude in fMRI-neurofeedback training

Neurofeedback (NF) aptitude, which refers to an individual's ability to change brain activity through NF training, has been reported to vary significantly from person to person. The prediction of individual NF aptitudes is critical in clinical applications to screen patients suitable for NF treatment. In the present study, we extracted the resting-state functional brain connectivity (FC) markers of NF aptitude, independent of NF-targeting brain regions. We combined the data from fMRI-NF studies targeting four different brain regions at two independent sites (obtained from 59 healthy adults and six patients with major depressive disorder) to collect resting-state fMRI data associated with aptitude scores in subsequent fMRI-NF training. We then trained the multiple regression models to predict the individual NF aptitude scores from the resting-state fMRI data using a discovery dataset from one site and identified six resting-state FCs that predicted NF aptitude. Subsequently, the reproducibility of the prediction model was validated using independent test data from another site. The identified FC model revealed that the posterior cingulate cortex was the functional hub among the brain regions and formed predictive resting-state FCs, suggesting that NF aptitude may be involved in the attentional mode-orientation modulation system's characteristics in task-free resting-state brain activity.

[1]  Kathrin Cohen Kadosh,et al.  A systematic review of the psychological factors that influence neurofeedback learning outcomes , 2019, NeuroImage.

[2]  Tim Mullen,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Disrupted Brain Activation and Deactivation Pattern during Semantic Verbal Fluency Task in Patients with Major Depression , 2017, Neuropsychobiology.

[4]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[5]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Putamen volume predicts real‐time fMRI neurofeedback learning success across paradigms and neurofeedback target regions , 2020, bioRxiv.

[6]  A. Craig How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Michael P. Weisend,et al.  Enhanced control of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex neurophysiology with real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback training and working memory practice , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  H. Wold Path Models with Latent Variables: The NIPALS Approach , 1975 .

[9]  Jerzy Bodurka,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Real-Time fMRI Amygdala Neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder: Effects on Symptoms and Autobiographical Memory Recall. , 2017, The American journal of psychiatry.

[10]  Kenji Doya,et al.  Prediction of clinical depression scores and detection of changes in whole-brain using resting-state functional MRI data with partial least squares regression , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Suzanne Wasylink,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity predicts neurofeedback response , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[12]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  fMRI Data Predict Individual Differences of Behavioral Effects of Nicotine: A Partial Least Square Analysis , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Partial least squares correlation of multivariate cognitive abilities and local brain structure in children and adolescents , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  N. Turk-Browne,et al.  Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[15]  Kymberly D. Young,et al.  Can we predict real‐time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity? , 2020, bioRxiv.

[16]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[17]  D. Sharp,et al.  The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI data using partial least squares , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Antidepressive effect of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex neurofeedback in patients with major depressive disorder: A preliminary report. , 2020, Journal of affective disorders.

[21]  R. Sitaram,et al.  How feedback, motor imagery, and reward influence brain self‐regulation using real‐time fMRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[22]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Putamen volume predicts real‐time fMRI neurofeedback learning success across paradigms and neurofeedback target regions , 2020, bioRxiv.

[23]  Nima Bigdely Shamlo,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features , 2020, NeuroImage.

[24]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: How is brain regulation mediated? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  Neurofeedback and networks of depression , 2014, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[26]  J. Yoshimoto,et al.  Enhancing Multi-Center Generalization of Machine Learning-Based Depression Diagnosis From Resting-State fMRI , 2019, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[27]  Richard J. Caselli,et al.  Linking functional and structural brain images with multivariate network analyses: A novel application of the partial least square method , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  P. Wighton,et al.  Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[29]  J. Yoshimoto,et al.  Enhancing Multi-Center Generalization of Machine Learning-Based Depression Diagnosis From Resting-State fMRI , 2019, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[30]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Simon H. Kohl,et al.  Determinants of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Performance and Improvement – a Machine Learning Mega-Analysis , 2020, bioRxiv.

[32]  Mia Hubert,et al.  Robust statistics for outlier detection , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[33]  Saori C. Tanaka,et al.  A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  A small number of abnormal brain connections predicts adult autism spectrum disorder , 2016, Nature Communications.

[35]  Michael Lifshitz,et al.  Neurofeedback with fMRI: A critical systematic review , 2017, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Morimoto,et al.  Primary functional brain connections associated with melancholic major depressive disorder and modulation by antidepressants , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[37]  N. Yahata,et al.  Neural basis of negativity bias in the perception of ambiguous facial expression , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[38]  M. Okada,et al.  Novel method to classify hemodynamic response obtained using multi-channel fNIRS measurements into two groups: exploring the combinations of channels , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Shinichi Nakajima,et al.  An Exhaustive Search and Stability of Sparse Estimation for Feature Selection Problem , 2015 .