Impact of unreported HIV‐1 reverse transcriptase mutations on phenotypic resistance to nucleoside and non‐nucleoside inhibitors

An extended spectrum of HIV‐1 reverse‐transcriptase (RT) mutations in HAART‐treated patients has been recently described. To verify the possible association of previously unreported RT mutations with a decrease of phenotypic susceptibility to nucleoside (NRTIs) and non‐nucleoside (NNRTIs) RT inhibitors, the RT sequence of 328 HIV‐1‐positive patients (102 naïve and 226 treated with HAART participating in either the PhenGen or Genpherex study) was analyzed. All treated patients were tested at the time of therapeutic failure with both phenotypic (Antivirogram®, Virco) and genotypic analyses (VircoGen™); the frequency of RT substitutions (positions 1–240) with respect to consensus B was compared to that of naïve patients using a Chi‐square test. Amino acid changes at 13 positions not included in the IAS list of resistance‐associated mutations were detected more frequently in treated than in naïve subjects. The mutations involving 10 of these positions were associated with a reduced susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs; K20R, T39A, K43EQN, E203KD, H208Y, and D218E were correlated with NRTI resistance while mutations K101EQP, H221Y, K223EQ, L228HR were associated to NNRTI resistance. A correlation was found between K20R and lamivudine resistance (P = 0.006) while T39A (P = 0.005), K43EQN (<0.001), E203KD (P = 0.010), and H208Y (P =  < 0.001) seemed to be associated with a previous use of zidovudine and stavudine and with the development of thymidine analog resistance. For H208Y, an association with use/resistance to abacavir (P = 0.004) was also noted. D218E showed a weak association to didanosine resistance (P = 0.013). The data confirm that previously unreported mutations are associated with antiretroviral drug experience and, more importantly, with a reduced susceptibility to NRTIs and NNRTIs. J. Med. Virol. 78:9–17, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, inc.

[1]  E. Daar Potency and Durability of Antiretroviral Therapy , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[2]  F. Chiodo,et al.  Variability in the Interpretation of Transmitted Genotypic HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Prediction of Virological Outcomes of the Initial Haart by Distinct Systems , 2004, Antiviral therapy.

[3]  J. Gathe Adherence and Potency With Antiretroviral Therapy: A Combination for Success , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[4]  A. Antinori,et al.  Selection of Antiretroviral Therapy Guided by Genotypic or Phenotypic Resistance Testing: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study (PhenGen) , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[5]  R. Haubrich,et al.  The Correlation between Plasma Concentrations of Protease Inhibitors, Medication Adherence and Virological Outcome in HIV-Infected Patients , 2004, Antiviral therapy.

[6]  B. Larder 3'-Azido-3'-deoxythymidine resistance suppressed by a mutation conferring human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors , 1992, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  J. Montaner,et al.  Discrepant results in the interpretation of HIV‐1 drug‐resistance genotypic data among widely used algorithms , 2003, HIV medicine.

[8]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Extended spectrum of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase mutations in patients receiving multiple nucleoside analog inhibitors , 2003, AIDS.

[9]  B. J. Betts,et al.  HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutation patterns responsible for discordances between genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms. , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[10]  C. Tinelli,et al.  Comparison between rules-based human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotype interpretations and real or virtual phenotype: concordance analysis and correlation with clinical outcome in heavily treated patients. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  S. Staszewski,et al.  Comparison of Nine Resistance Interpretation Systems for HIV-1 Genotyping , 2002, Antiviral therapy.

[12]  M. Nolan,et al.  Polymorphism in protease and reverse transcriptase and phenotypic drug resistance of HIV-1 recombinant CRF02_AG isolates from patients with no prior use of antiretroviral drugs in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[13]  Matthew J. Gonzales,et al.  Distribution of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease and Reverse Transcriptase Mutation Patterns in 4,183 Persons Undergoing Genotypic Resistance Testing , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  C. Tinelli,et al.  HIV-1 resistance to dideoxynucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: genotypic-phenotypic correlations. , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[15]  Joel E Gallant,et al.  Nucleoside and Nucleotide Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: A Clinical Review of Antiretroviral Resistance , 2002, Antiviral therapy.

[16]  Susan Swindells,et al.  Adherence to Protease Inhibitor Therapy and Outcomes in Patients with HIV Infection , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  John W. Mellors,et al.  A Novel Polymorphism at Codon 333 of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Can Facilitate Dual Resistance to Zidovudine and l-2′,3′-Dideoxy-3′-Thiacytidine , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[18]  Brendan Larder,et al.  Genotypic Correlates of Phenotypic Resistance to Efavirenz in Virus Isolates from Patients Failing Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Therapy , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[19]  A. Antinori,et al.  Usefulness of monitoring HIV drug resistance and adherence in individuals failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized study (ARGENTA) , 2002, AIDS.

[20]  C. Kuiken,et al.  HIV sequence databases. , 2003, AIDS reviews.

[21]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Geno2pheno: estimating phenotypic drug resistance from HIV-1 genotypes , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Bryan Chan,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and protease sequence database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  C. Tinelli,et al.  Real versus virtual phenotype to guide treatment in heavily pretreated patients: 48-week follow-up of the Genotipo-Fenotipo di Resistenza (GenPheRex) trial. , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.