Implementation and evaluation of the ultrasonic TOF tomography for the NDT of concrete structures

In contrast to X-rays, ultrasound propagates along a curved path due to spatial variations in the refraction index of the medium. Thus, for ultrasonic TOF tomography, the propagation path of the ultrasound must be known to correctly reconstruct the slice image. In this paper, we propose a new path determination algorithm, which is essentially a numerical solution of the eikonal equation viewed as a boundary value problem. Due to the curved propagation path of ultrasound, the image reconstruction algorithm takes the algebraic approach, for instance, the ART or the SART. Note that the image reconstruction step requires the propagation path and the paths can be determined only if the image is known. Thus, an iterative approach is taken to solve this apparent dilemma. First, the slice image is initially reconstructed assuming straight propagation paths. Then, the paths are computed based on the recently reconstructed image (using our path determination algorithm) which is then used to update the reconstructed image. This process of image reconstruction and path determination repeats until convergence. This approach is tested with simulation data as well as TOF data from a real concrete structure using a mechanical scanner.

[1]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image Reconstruction From Projections , 1975, Real Time Imaging.

[2]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[3]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Medical imaging systems , 1983 .

[4]  M. Soumekh,et al.  Signal Processing for Diffraction Tomography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[5]  Albert Goldstein,et al.  Ultrasound Pulse-Echo Reflection from Test Object Cylindrical Reflectors , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  A top‐down philosophy for accurate numerical ray tracing , 1986 .

[7]  M. Kaveh,et al.  Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image Reconstruction From Projections , 1975, Real Time Imaging.

[9]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ACOUSTIC VELOCITIES IN TISSUE FROM THEIR TIME-OF-FLIGHT PROFILES. , 1975 .

[10]  T. J. Gomm,et al.  State of the technology : Ultrasonic tomography , 1999 .

[11]  J. P. Jones,et al.  Foundations of Medical Imaging , 1993 .

[12]  H. Schomberg,et al.  An improved approach to reconstructive ultrasound tomography , 1978 .

[13]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Convergence Studies on Iterative Algorithms for Image Reconstruction , 2003, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Limited Angle Multifrequency Diffraction Tomography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[15]  A. Cormack Representation of a Function by Its Line Integrals, with Some Radiological Applications , 1963 .

[16]  Michael P. Schuller,et al.  Evaluation of Concrete using Acoustic Tomography , 1995 .

[17]  J.F. Havlice,et al.  Medical ultrasonic imaging: An overview of principles and instrumentation , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  G. Glover,et al.  Reconstruction of Ultrasound Propagation Speed Distributions in Soft Tissue: Time-Of-Flight Tomography , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[19]  A. H. Andersen Algebraic reconstruction in CT from limited views. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  J. Holden,et al.  Foundations of medical imaging , 1995 .

[21]  A. C. Kak,et al.  Digital ray tracing in two‐dimensional refractive fields , 1982 .

[22]  Olivier Basset,et al.  Ultrasonic transmission tomography in refracting media: reduction of refraction artifacts by curved-ray techniques , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  A. Kak,et al.  A computational study of reconstruction algorithms for diffraction tomography: Interpolation versus filtered-backpropagation , 1983 .