Voice and Ellipsis

Elided VPs and their antecedent VPs can mismatch in voice, with passive VPs being elided under apparent identity with active antecedent VPs, and vice versa. Such voice mismatches are not allowed in any other kind of ellipsis, such as sluicing and other clausal ellipses. These latter facts appear to indicate that the identity relation in ellipsis is sensitive to syntactic form, not merely to semantic form. The VPellipsis facts fall into place if the head that determines voice is external to the phrase being elided, here argued to be vP; such an account can only be framed in approaches that allow syntactic features to be separated from the heads on which they are morphologically realized. Alternatives to this syntactic, articulated view of ellipsis and voice either undergenerate or overgenerate.

[1]  J. Merchant.  Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax , 2009 .

[2]  Ryan Bennett,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th west coast conference on formal linguistics , 2012 .

[3]  Christian Barker.  Scopability and sluicing , 2013 .

[4]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[5]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  The crosslinguistic syntax of sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives , 2006 .

[6]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Polarity Items under Ellipsis , 2013 .

[7]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can't, but not Why * , 2008 .

[8]  R. Lees.  The grammar of English nominalizations , 1960 .

[9]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  In Search of the English Middle Field , 2004 .

[10]  Ka Cormier,et al.  Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , 2004 .

[11]  Luis Vicente,et al.  Short negative replies in Spanish , 2006 .

[12]  Donald C. Baumer,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2006 .

[13]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Minimal Pronouns 1 Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Bound Variable Pronouns , 2006 .

[14]  Gregory Ward,et al.  On the Semantics and Pragmatics of ‘Identifier so’ , 1999 .

[15]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Toward a theory of anaphoric processing , 1984 .

[16]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[17]  William Harwood,et al.  Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis , 2015 .

[18]  Youssef A. Haddad.  Attitude datives in Lebanese Arabic and the interplay of syntax and pragmatics , 2014 .

[19]  Andres Saab,et al.  Im)possible deletions in the Spanish DP , 2011 .

[20]  Edda Weigand,et al.  (In)coherence of Discourse , 2009 .

[21]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Ellipsis and discourse coherence , 2006, Linguistics and philosophy.

[22]  Peter Hallman,et al.  NP-Interpretation and the Structure of Predicates , 2004 .

[23]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[24]  Andrés Leandro Saab,et al.  No N-raising out of NPs in Spanish: ellipsis as a diagnostic of head movement , 2014 .

[25]  James Mccloskey.  Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish , 1991 .

[26]  Vera Gribanova,et al.  Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex , 2013 .

[27]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Islands and LF-movement in Greek sluicing , 2000 .

[28]  Artemis Alexiadou,et al.  Middle Voice and reflexive interpretations: afto-prefixation in Greek , 2015 .

[29]  Mark Baltin,et al.  Structural approaches to ellipsis , 2014 .

[30]  Susanne Winkler.  Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar , 2005 .

[31]  Lobke Aelbrecht,et al.  The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis , 2010 .

[32]  Daniel Mason.  The Piano Tuner , 2002 .

[33]  J. Merchant.  The syntax of silence , 2001 .

[34]  Lyn Frazier.  Two Interpretive Systems for Natural Language? , 2015, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[35]  David M. Perlmutter.  Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[36]  Catherine Rose Fortin,et al.  Indonesian sluicing and verb phrase ellipsis: Description and explanation in a minimalist framework. , 2007 .

[37]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[38]  M. Baker,et al.  Passive Arguments Raised , 2018, Diachronic and Comparative Syntax.

[39]  Gary Thoms,et al.  ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing , 2011 .

[40]  Mark Baltin,et al.  Deletion versus pro-forms: an overly simple dichotomy? , 2012 .

[41]  Kirsten Gengel.  Phases and ellipsis , 2005 .

[42]  Kyle Johnson.  Variable island repair under ellipsis , 2001 .

[43]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[44]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Topics in Ellipsis , 2010 .

[45]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface , 2004 .

[46]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[47]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[48]  Jason Overfelt,et al.  Unbounded successive-cyclic rightward DP-movement☆ , 2015 .

[49]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[50]  Danny Fox,et al.  Economy and Semantic Interpretation , 1999 .

[51]  Chris Collins,et al.  A smuggling approach to the passive in english , 2005 .

[52]  Luisa Martí.  Grammar versus Pragmatics: Carving Nature at the Joints , 2015 .

[53]  Miriam Butt,et al.  The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , 2004 .

[54]  Terry Pratchett,et al.  Men at Arms , 1993 .

[55]  Eric Potsdam,et al.  English Verbal Morphology and VP Ellipsis , 2013 .

[56]  I. Sag,et al.  Interrogative Investigations , 2001 .

[57]  Gary Thoms,et al.  Syntactic identity, Parallelism and accommodated antecedents , 2015 .

[58]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  Antecedent-Contained Sluicing , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[59]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[60]  J. Legate.  Some Interface Properties of the Phase , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[61]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  Voice Mismatch and Syntactic Identity , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[62]  James Mccloskey.  The syntax of the Celtic languages: Subjects and subject positions in Irish , 1996 .

[63]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  Ellipsis in Dutch dialects , 2004 .

[64]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[65]  Ken Turner,et al.  The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view , 1999 .

[66]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  On ellipsis structures involving a wh-remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously , 2014 .

[67]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verbphrase Anaphors , 1990 .

[68]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .

[69]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[70]  Shoichi Danny Takahashi Fox.  MaxElide and the Re-binding Problem , 2005 .

[71]  C. Clifton,et al.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[72]  John Thomas Grinder.  On deletion Phenomena in English , 1976 .

[73]  Philip H. Miller,et al.  Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar , 1992 .

[74]  Michael John Houser,et al.  The Syntax and Semantics of Do So Anaphora , 2010 .

[75]  Johan Rooryck,et al.  Phrase structure and the lexicon , 1996 .

[76]  Maziar Toosarvandani,et al.  Ellipsis in Farsi Complex Predicates , 2009 .

[77]  Sandra Chung.  Syntactic Identity in Sluicing: How Much and Why , 2013, Linguistic Inquiry.

[78]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  LF-copying without LF , 2015 .

[79]  James Mccloskey.  On the scope of verb movement in Irish , 1996 .

[80]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Accounting for Voice Mismatch in Ellipsis , 2012 .

[81]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis , 2014 .

[82]  Jason Merchant,et al.  How Much Context Is Enough? Two Cases of Span-Conditioned Stem Allomorphy , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.

[83]  Michael Frazier,et al.  Parasitic Gaps licensed by elided syntactic structure , 2015 .

[84]  John Bowers.  The syntax of predication , 1993 .

[85]  K. A. Jayaseelan.  IP‐internal topic and focus phrases , 2001 .

[86]  Lobke Aelbrecht,et al.  To Be Or Not To Be Elided: VP ellipsis revisited , 2015 .

[87]  Chris Collins,et al.  The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory , 2001 .

[88]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Ellipsis and higher-order unification , 1991 .

[89]  Ljiljana Progovac,et al.  Non-sentential vs. Ellipsis Approaches: Review and Extensions , 2013, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[90]  Roumyana Pancheva,et al.  Chapter 34. Implicit Arguments , 2007 .

[91]  Mark Baltin,et al.  Movement to the Higher V Is Remnant Movement , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[92]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006 , 2006 .

[93]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  When a Complement PP Goes Missing: AStudy on the Licensing Condition of Swiping , 2006 .

[94]  Mark Baltin,et al.  The Interaction of Ellipsis and Binding: Implications for the Sequencing of Principle A , 2003 .

[95]  J. Merchant.  An Asymmetry in Voice Mismatches in VP-Ellipsis and Pseudogapping , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[96]  A. Lobeck.  Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification , 1995 .

[97]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  When a complement PP goes missing: a study on the licensing of Swiping , 2006 .

[98]  Lobke Aelbrecht.  IP-ellipsis in Dutch dialects: X+that-clause , 2006 .

[99]  Jeremy Hartman,et al.  The Semantic Uniformity of Traces: Evidence from Ellipsis Parallelism , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[100]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coherence in discourse , 2005 .

[101]  Sandra Chung,et al.  Sluicing and the Lexicon: The Point of No Return , 2005 .

[102]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon , 2001 .

[103]  Paula Kempchinsky,et al.  Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory , 1997 .

[104]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Verb phrase ellipsis: form, meaning, and processing , 1993 .

[105]  Lotus Goldberg,et al.  Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study , 2005 .

[106]  Michael Franke,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium , 2005 .

[107]  Rhanghyeyun Kim,et al.  On the Negativity of Negative Fragment Answers and Ellipsis Resolution , 2013 .

[108]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  The Acceptability Cline in VP Ellipsis , 2011 .

[109]  Karlos Arregi,et al.  Ellipsis in split questions , 2010 .

[110]  David Basilico,et al.  Object Position and Predication Forms , 1998 .

[111]  Dennis Ott,et al.  An Ellipsis Approach to Contrastive Left-Dislocation , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[112]  Daniel Hardt.  Inference, Ellipsis and Deaccenting , 2007 .

[113]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  Syntactic identity and ellipsis , 2011 .

[114]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Introducing Arguments , 2002 .

[115]  Heidi Harley,et al.  External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v , 2013 .

[116]  M. Everaert,et al.  The Unaccusativity Puzzle , 2004 .

[117]  Tanja Temmerman,et al.  The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: on the PF-theory of islands and the wh/sluicing correlation , 2013 .

[118]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects , 2010 .

[119]  Line Mikkelsen,et al.  Verb Phrase Pronominalization in Danish : Deep or Surface Anaphora ? * , 2007 .