Computer-Assisted Pattern Recognition of Autoantibody Results

ABSTRACT Immunoassay-based anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) screens are increasingly used in the initial evaluation of autoimmune disorders, but these tests offer no “pattern information” comparable to the information from indirect fluorescence assay-based screens. Thus, there is no indication of “next steps” when a positive result is obtained. To improve the utility of immunoassay-based ANA screening, we evaluated a new method that combines a multiplex immunoassay with a k nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm for computer-assisted pattern recognition. We assembled a training set, consisting of 1,152 sera from patients with various rheumatic diseases and nondiseased patients. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex method and algorithm were evaluated with a test set that consisted of 173 sera collected at a rheumatology clinic from patients diagnosed by using standard criteria, as well as 152 age- and sex-matched sera from presumably healthy individuals (sera collected at a blood bank). The test set was also evaluated with a HEp-2 cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both the ELISA and multiplex immunoassay results were positive for 94% of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. The kNN algorithm correctly proposed an SLE pattern for 84% of the antibody-positive SLE patients. For patients with no connective tissue disease, the multiplex method found fewer positive results than the ELISA screen, and no disease was proposed by the kNN algorithm for most of these patients. In conclusion, the automated algorithm could identify SLE patterns and may be useful in the identification of patients who would benefit from early referral to a specialist, as well as patients who do not require further evaluation.

[1]  I. Peene,et al.  Detection of specific antinuclear reactivities in patients with negative anti-nuclear antibody immunofluorescence screening tests. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  Harry R. Hill,et al.  Evaluation of Multiplexed Fluorescent Microsphere Immunoassay for Detection of Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[3]  G. Burdick,et al.  A new ELISA for the detection of double-stranded DNA antibodies. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.

[4]  R. Black,et al.  Zinc Supplementation Reduces the Incidence of Acute Lower Respiratory Infections in Infants and Preschool Children: A Double-blind, Controlled Trial , 1998, Pediatrics.

[5]  J F Fries,et al.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  R. Shmerling,et al.  Antinuclear Antibody Testing: A Study of Clinical Utility , 1996 .

[7]  H J Moens,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis of rheumatic disorders. , 1991, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  Bart Wyns,et al.  Prediction of diagnosis in patients with early arthritis using a combined Kohonen mapping and instance-based evaluation criterion , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  S. Teklehaimanot,et al.  Comparison of the entropy technique with two other techniques for detecting disease clustering using data from children with high blood lead levels. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  J. Wade Davis,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2003, Technometrics.

[12]  M. Dalakas 1 – A Classification of Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis , 1988 .

[13]  R. Burlingame,et al.  Subnucleosome structures as substrates in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  S. Schewe,et al.  Stepwise development of a clinical expert system in rheumatology , 2004, The clinical investigator.

[15]  J. Koziol,et al.  A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. III. Comparative performance characteristics of academic and manufacturers' laboratories. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  H J Moens,et al.  Development and validation of a computer program using Bayes's theorem to support diagnosis of rheumatic disorders. , 1992, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Nicola Bizzaro,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Elisa Methods as an Alternative Screening Test to Indirect Immunofluorescence for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies. Evaluation of Five Commercial Kits , 2004, Autoimmunity.

[19]  R J Fulton,et al.  Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  D. Keren Antinuclear antibody testing. , 2002, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[21]  R. Sokal,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (2nd ed.). , 1982 .

[22]  A Zlatkis,et al.  Capillary column gas chromatographic profile analysis of volatile compounds in sera of normal and virus-infected patients. , 1979, Journal of chromatography.

[23]  A Kavanaugh,et al.  Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[24]  P. Brown,et al.  Autoantigen microarrays for multiplex characterization of autoantibody responses , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[25]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Mapping tumor growth rates in patients with malignant gliomas: A test of two algorithms , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  T. Sato,et al.  Classification criteria for polymyositis and dermatomyositis. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[27]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios , 2005, The Lancet.

[28]  G. Samsa,et al.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  G. Jacob,et al.  Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[30]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[31]  Anne-Marie Rouquette,et al.  Evaluation of the new multiplexed immunoassay, FIDIS, for simultaneous quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Prediction of lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using artificial neural networks , 2002, Lupus.

[33]  L. Leiva,et al.  Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) and ANA Profile Tests in Children with Autoimmune Disorders: A Retrospective Study , 2000, Clinical Rheumatology.

[34]  A. Masi Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 1980, Bulletin on the rheumatic diseases.

[35]  James F. Fries,et al.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[37]  M L Astion,et al.  Application of neural networks to the classification of giant cell arteritis. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  Allan Wiik,et al.  Detection of antinuclear antibodies by solid-phase immunoassays and immunofluorescence analysis. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[39]  R. Jonsson,et al.  Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[40]  G. Hu,et al.  Parallel detection of autoantibodies with microarrays in rheumatoid diseases. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[41]  S. Binder,et al.  Detection of Immunoglobulin M Antibodies Specific for Toxoplasma gondii with Increased Selectivity for Recently Acquired Infections , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[42]  Daniel H Solomon,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: antinuclear antibody testing. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[43]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[44]  L C Kingsland,et al.  Computer-assisted Diagnosis of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases , 1998, Pediatrics.

[45]  W. Dunne,et al.  Evaluation of a Multiplexed Bead Assay for Assessment of Epstein-Barr Virus Immunologic Status , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[46]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Evaluation of the BioPlex™ 2200 ANA Screen: Analysis of 510 Healthy Subjects: Incidence of Natural/Predictive Autoantibodies , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.