Classification of mathematics deficiency using shape and scale analysis of 3D brain structures

We investigate the use of a recent technique for shape analysis of brain substructures in identifying learning disabilities in third-grade children. This Riemannian technique provides a quantification of differences in shapes of parameterized surfaces, using a distance that is invariant to rigid motions and re-parameterizations. Additionally, it provides an optimal registration across surfaces for improved matching and comparisons. We utilize an efficient gradient based method to obtain the optimal re-parameterizations of surfaces. In this study we consider 20 different substructures in the human brain and correlate the differences in their shapes with abnormalities manifested in deficiency of mathematical skills in 106 subjects. The selection of these structures is motivated in part by the past links between their shapes and cognitive skills, albeit in broader contexts. We have studied the use of both individual substructures and multiple structures jointly for disease classification. Using a leave-one-out nearest neighbor classifier, we obtained a 62.3% classification rate based on the shape of the left hippocampus. The use of multiple structures resulted in an improved classification rate of 71.4%.

[1]  Liza Gross,et al.  A Neural Seat for Math? , 2006, PLoS biology.

[2]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Hippocampal shape analysis using medial surfaces , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Martin Styner,et al.  Multi-Object Analysis of Volume, Pose, and Shape Using Statistical Discrimination , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[6]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .

[7]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parameterization-Invariant Shape Comparisons of Anatomical Surfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Relationship between hippocampal volume and memory ability in healthy individuals across the lifespan: review and meta-analysis. , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  The Basal Ganglia in Human Learning , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  A novel riemannian framework for shape analysis of 3D objects , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Building 3-D Statistical Shape Models by Direct Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  M. Miller,et al.  Hippocampal deformities in schizophrenia characterized by high dimensional brain mapping. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Entropy-Based Particle Systems for Shape Correspondence , 2006 .

[16]  Martin Styner,et al.  Shape versus Size: Improved Understanding of the Morphology of Brain Structures , 2001, MICCAI.

[17]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.