Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development

Supporting undergraduate students with their academic literacies has recently been a major focus in higher education in the UK. This paper explores the value of tutor mediation in the context of academic writing development among undergraduate business studies students in open and distance learning, following the dynamic assessment (DA) approach that has been developed within Vygotskian sociocultural theory of learning (Vygotsky, 1978). DA is an assessment approach that blends instruction and assessment. The data, which came from a pilot study of a larger research project, consisted of text-based interaction between a tutor–researcher and two business studies students across various drafts of two assignments in line with the DA approach. This interaction was mediated by computers mainly through emails. The analyses of such interaction suggest that DA can help to identify and respond to the areas that students need the most support in (in this study, managing information flow). Finally, we argue that a learning theory-driven approach such as DA can contribute to undergraduate students’ academic writing development by responding to their individual needs.

[1]  Mary R. Lea,et al.  New contexts, new challenges : the teaching of writing in UK higher education. , 2006 .

[2]  D. Boud,et al.  Aligning assessment with long‐term learning , 2006 .

[3]  C. Lidz,et al.  Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context: Dynamic Assessment of the Evolving Cognitive Functions in Children , 2003 .

[4]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Measuring the Academic Skills of University Students: Evaluation of a diagnostic procedure , 2010 .

[5]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1994 .

[6]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension , 2011 .

[7]  C. Bazerman.  Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[8]  Neil Duncan,et al.  ‘Feed‐forward’: improving students' use of tutors' comments , 2007 .

[9]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[10]  Lesa A. Stern,et al.  Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled , 2006 .

[11]  Mary Lea,et al.  Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach , 1998 .

[12]  Mirabelle Walker,et al.  An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? , 2009 .

[13]  Karen Handley,et al.  From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback , 2011 .

[14]  C. Lidz.  Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment , 1991 .

[15]  D. Carless.  Differing perceptions in the feedback process , 2006 .

[16]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[17]  Matthew E. Poehner,et al.  Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning , 2007 .

[18]  M. Weaver,et al.  Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses , 2006 .

[19]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition , 1995, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[20]  R. Feuerstein,et al.  The Dynamic Assessment of Cognitive Modi®ability. The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, Instruments and Techniques , 2004 .

[21]  M. Cole,et al.  The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky , 2007 .

[22]  Helen Timperley,et al.  Feedback to Writing, Assessment for Teaching and Learning and Student Progress. , 2010 .

[23]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[24]  M. E. Poehner.  Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency Among Advanced L2 Learners of French , 2005 .

[25]  Helen Gartley,et al.  The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education , 2002 .

[26]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context: Intrapersonal Communication and Internalization in the Second Language Classroom , 2003 .

[27]  Marta Antón.  Dynamic Assessment of Advanced Second Language Learners , 2009 .

[28]  K. Ellery,et al.  Assessment for learning: a case study using feedback effectively in an essay‐style test , 2008 .

[29]  Alexander Zahar,et al.  Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science , 1991, Medical History.

[30]  E. Fox,et al.  Metacognition and Self-Regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky , 2008 .

[31]  Alex Kozulin,et al.  Sociocultural Theory and the Mediated Learning Experience , 2002 .

[32]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[33]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development , 2006 .

[34]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[35]  D. Sadler,et al.  Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory , 1998 .

[36]  Alex Kozulin,et al.  Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context: Psychological Tools and Mediated Learning , 2003 .

[37]  M. E. Poehner.  GROUP DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT: MEDIATION FOR THE L2 CLASSROOM , 2009 .

[38]  Ana Oskoz.  Students' Dynamic Assessment via Online Chat. , 2013 .

[39]  B. Huot,et al.  Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning , 2002 .