Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017

[1]  J. A. César,et al.  On-demand cesarean section: assessing trends and socioeconomic disparities , 2019, Revista de saude publica.

[2]  C. Szwarcwald,et al.  [Evaluation of data from the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC)]. , 2019, Cadernos de saude publica.

[3]  M. Brunherotti,et al.  Spatial distribution of Robson 10‐group classification system and poverty in southern and southeastern Brazil , 2019, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  M. Lazzerini,et al.  Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations , 2019, BMJ Open.

[5]  C. Szwarcwald,et al.  [Evaluation of data from the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC)]. , 2019, Cadernos de saude publica.

[6]  R. Silver,et al.  Placenta Accreta Spectrum. , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  E. Fosse,et al.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[8]  Mônica Almeida Neri,et al.  Strategic measures to reduce the caesarean section rate in Brazil , 2018, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Homer,et al.  Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children , 2018, The Lancet.

[10]  S. Gama,et al.  Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil , 2018, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  Juan Liang,et al.  Prior caesarean section and likelihood of vaginal birth, 2012–2016, China , 2018, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  M. D'Alton,et al.  Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population‐based analysis using the Robson 10‐Group Classification System , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Shiliang Liu,et al.  Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity , 2018, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  R. Silver,et al.  Placenta Accreta Spectrum , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  I. Calderon,et al.  Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil , 2018, PloS one.

[16]  M. E. Moreira,et al.  Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth , 2016, Reproductive Health.

[17]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Caesarean Section in Peru: Analysis of Trends Using the Robson Classification System , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Silvânia Suely Caribé de Araújo Andrade,et al.  Avaliação do Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos. Brasil, 2006 a 2010 , 2015 .

[19]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies , 2015, Reproductive Health.

[20]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[21]  F. Goffinet,et al.  Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population? , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  M. Torloni,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  J. Fahey,et al.  Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system. , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[24]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  D. Huang,et al.  Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section? , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[26]  M. D'Alton,et al.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal complications , 2008, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[27]  J. Potter,et al.  Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale. , 2008, Birth.

[28]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[29]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[30]  S. Schwartzman.  Legitimacy, Controversies and Translation in Public Statistics: The Experience of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics , 1999 .

[31]  M. H. S. Jorge,et al.  Manual de instruçöes para o preenchimento da Declaraçäo de Nascido Vivo , 1996 .