A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography

The maximum likelihood (ML) approach to estimating the radioactive distribution in the body cross section has become very popular among researchers in emission computed tomography (ECT) since it has been shown to provide very good images compared to those produced with the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm. The expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is an often-used iterative approach for maximizing the Poisson likelihood in ECT because of its attractive theoretical and practical properties. Its major disadvantage is that, due to its slow rate of convergence, a large amount of computation is often required to achieve an acceptable image. Here, the authors present a row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) as an alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing the Poisson likelihood in ECT. The authors deduce the convergence properties of this algorithm and demonstrate by way of computer simulations that the early iterates of RAMLA increase the Poisson likelihood in ECT at an order of magnitude faster that the standard EM algorithm. Specifically, the authors show that, from the point of view of measuring total radionuclide uptake in simulated brain phantoms, iterations 1, 2, 3, and 4 of RAMLA perform at least as well as iterations 45, 60, 70, and 80, respectively, of EM. Moreover, the authors show that iterations 1, 2, 3, and 4 of RAMLA achieve comparable likelihood values as iterations 45, 60, 70, and 80, respectively, of EM. The authors also present a modified version of a recent fast ordered subsets EM (OS-EM) algorithm and show that RAMLA is a special case of this modified OS-EM. Furthermore, the authors show that their modification converges to a ML solution whereas the standard OS-EM does not.

[1]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[2]  K. Tanabe Projection method for solving a singular system of linear equations and its applications , 1971 .

[3]  N. J. Dusaussoy,et al.  Some new multiplicative algorithms for image reconstruction from projections , 1990 .

[4]  T. J. Herbert Statistical stopping criteria for iterative maximum likelihood reconstruction of emission images , 1990 .

[5]  K. Lange Convergence of EM image reconstruction algorithms with Gibbs smoothing. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[6]  J Llacer,et al.  Feasible images and practical stopping rules for iterative algorithms in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  G. Krishna,et al.  Vector-extrapolated fast maximum likelihood estimation algorithms for emission tomography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  G. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood PET with Real Data , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[13]  T K Narayan,et al.  A methodology for testing for statistically significant differences between fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[15]  R. Huesman,et al.  Emission computed tomography , 1979 .

[16]  Z. Liang,et al.  Bayesian image processing of data from constrained source distributions—II. valued, uncorrelated and correlated constraints , 1987 .

[17]  Jolyon A. Browne,et al.  Developments with maximum likelihood X-ray computed tomography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Albert Macovski,et al.  A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Emission Image Reconstruction from Projections , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Performance of a Fast Maximum Likelihood Algorithm for Fully 3D PET Reconstruction , 1996 .

[21]  Y. Censor Row-Action Methods for Huge and Sparse Systems and Their Applications , 1981 .

[22]  G T Herman,et al.  Performance evaluation of an iterative image reconstruction algorithm for positron emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[23]  M E Raichle,et al.  Positron-emission tomography. , 1980, Scientific American.

[24]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  Multiplicative iterative methods in computed tomography , 1991 .

[26]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Fusion of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody SPECT Images with CT/MRI Images , 1992 .

[27]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  On methods for maximum a posteriori image reconstruction with a normal prior , 1992, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[28]  M I Miller,et al.  Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography incorporating Good's roughness prior on massively parallel processors. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction for Positron Emission Tomography Based on the EM Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Mordecai Avriel,et al.  Nonlinear programming , 1976 .

[31]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques can be made computationally efficient [positron emission tomography application] , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[32]  S. Twomey Comparison of constrained linear inversion and an iterative nonlinear algorithm applied to the indirect estimation of particle size distributions , 1975 .

[33]  Y. Censor,et al.  On some optimization techniques in image reconstruction from projections , 1987 .

[34]  Y. Censor,et al.  Strong underrelaxation in Kaczmarz's method for inconsistent systems , 1983 .

[35]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[36]  Martin Bland,et al.  An Introduction to Medical Statistics , 1987 .

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[38]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[39]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Implementation of an accelerated iterative algorithm for cone-beam SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  B F Hutton,et al.  Use of 3D reconstruction to correct for patient motion in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  K. Lange,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Some Maximum Likelihood Algorithms for Emission and Transmission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..