Influence of the composition/texture of Mn–Na–W catalysts on the oxidative coupling of methane

Abstract Mn–Na–W silica supported catalysts are highly selective toward ethylene and ethane in the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) process. However, they present lower activities than La/Sr/CaO catalysts and subsequently a lower ethylene productivity. Optimisation of the Mn–Na–W catalysts has been focused within the range of 2–8 wt% of active elements relative to the support, while silica is partially converted into inert cristobalite. This study focused on the increase of the activity of Mn–Na–W catalysts while maintaining their intrinsically high C 2 selectivity. The increase in the concentration of the active elements with respect to the support revealed that the improvement of the catalyst activity was possible but limited. A high concentration of Mn–Na–W favours the formation of a smooth cristobalite phase and strongly decreased the number of active sites. The silica support was replaced by silica-free supports to limit the formation of cristobalite. The use of SiC as a support led to the formation of cristobalite near the surface of the catalysts but the porous SiC skeleton, which remained non-oxidised at the core of the catalysts, allowed maintaining a high surface area. SiC supported catalysts thus presented higher activities than silica catalysts. The use of α-alumina support led to catalysts with lower performances and revealed that exposed alumina was detrimental for the catalyst performance.

[1]  R. M. Lambert,et al.  New efficient catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2000 .

[2]  Anders Holmen,et al.  Direct conversion of methane to fuels and chemicals , 2009 .

[3]  Y. S. Lin,et al.  Oxidative coupling of methane on fluorite-structured samarium–yttrium–bismuth oxide , 2001 .

[4]  V. Choudhary,et al.  Oxidative Conversion of Methane/Natural Gas into Higher Hydrocarbons , 2004 .

[5]  Martin O'Connell,et al.  Towards mass production of microstructured fuel processors for application in future distributed energy generation systems: A review of recent progress at IMM , 2012 .

[6]  Gunther Kolb,et al.  Micro-structured reactors for gas phase reactions , 2004 .

[7]  S. Pak,et al.  Thermal effects during the oxidative coupling of methane over Mn/Na2WO4/SiO2 and Mn/Na2WO4/MgO catalysts , 1998 .

[8]  V. Meille,et al.  Review on methods to deposit catalysts on structured surfaces , 2006 .

[9]  R. M. Lambert,et al.  Critical influence of the amorphous silica-to-cristobalite phase transition on the performance of Mn/Na2WO4/SiO2 catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 1998 .

[10]  Yangyang Shi,et al.  Highly Ordered Mesoporous Silicon Carbide Ceramics with Large Surface Areas and High Stability , 2006 .

[11]  R. Schomäcker,et al.  Fluidized bed processing of sodium tungsten manganese catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2011 .

[12]  Y. Schuurman,et al.  Synthesis of enamel-protected catalysts for microchannel reactors: Application to methane oxidative coupling , 2012 .

[13]  W. Green,et al.  Upper bound on the yield for oxidative coupling of methane , 2003 .

[14]  Malcolm L. H. Green,et al.  The relationship between the structure and the performance of Na-W-Mn/SiO2 catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2002 .

[15]  S. T. Sie,et al.  The shell middle distillate synthesis process (SMDS) , 1988 .

[16]  V. Sadykov,et al.  Partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over corundum supported mixed oxides: One channel studies , 2005 .

[17]  J. Dubois,et al.  Oxidative coupling of methane: maximizing the yield of coupling products under cofeed operating conditions , 1990 .

[18]  R. Moyes,et al.  Oxidative coupling of methane on sodium aluminate- and magnesium oxide- supported samarium oxide , 1991 .

[19]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Characteristics of an integrated micro packed bed reactor-heat exchanger for methanol synthesis from syngas , 2011 .

[20]  S. Cho,et al.  Oxidative coupling of methane over Na+-ZrO2-C1-/Al2O3 catalysts , 1997 .

[21]  Guy Marin,et al.  Catalyst design based on microkinetic models: Oxidative coupling of methane , 2011 .

[22]  Dean‐Mo Liu.  Oxidation of polycrystalline α-silicon carbide ceramic , 1997 .

[23]  Helmut Pennemann,et al.  High-temperature parallel screening of catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2008 .

[24]  Dong Hoe Kim,et al.  Size-controlled synthesis of monodispersed mesoporous α-alumina spheres by a template-free forced hydrolysis method. , 2011, Dalton transactions.

[25]  Martin Holena,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Past Catalytic Data on Oxidative Methane Coupling for New Insights into the Composition of High‐Performance Catalysts , 2011 .

[26]  R. Schomäcker,et al.  Mn–Na2WO4/SiO2 as catalyst for the oxidative coupling of methane. What is really known? , 2012 .

[27]  Nick Burke,et al.  The promoting effect of ceria on Li/MgO catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2011 .

[28]  C. Mirodatos,et al.  Surface chemistry in the oxidative coupling of methane , 1995 .

[29]  Haitao Liu,et al.  A novel Na2WO4–Mn/SiC monolithic foam catalyst with improved thermal properties for the oxidative coupling of methane , 2008 .

[30]  G. Chuah,et al.  The effect of digestion on the surface area and porosity of alumina , 2000 .

[31]  A. Talebizadeh,et al.  Kinetic study of oxidative coupling of methane over Mn and/or W promoted Na2SO4/SiO2 catalysts , 2011 .

[32]  E. Wolf,et al.  Methane utilization by oxidative coupling: I. A study of reactions in the gas phase during the cofeeding of methane and oxygen , 1988 .