Prediction of bacteremia using TREAT, a computerized decision-support system.

BACKGROUND Prediction of bloodstream infection at the time of sepsis onset allows one to make appropriate and economical management decisions. METHODS The TREAT computerized decision-support system uses a causal probabilistic network, which is locally calibrated, to predict cases of bacteremia. We assessed the system's performance in 2 independent cohorts that included patients with suspected sepsis. Both studies were conducted in Israel, Italy, and Germany. Data were collected prospectively and were entered into the TREAT system at the time that blood samples were obtained for culture. Discriminative power was assessed using a receiver-operating characteristics curve. RESULTS In the first cohort, 790 patients were included. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for prediction of bacteremia using the TREAT system was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.73). We used TREAT's prediction values to draw thresholds defining a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups for bacteremia, in which 3 (2.4%) of 123, 62 (12.8%) of 483, and 55 (29.9%) of 184 patients were bacteremic, respectively. In the second cohort, 1724 patients were included. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73). The prevalence of bacteremia observed in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups defined by the first cohort were 1.3% (4 of 300 patients), 13.2% (150 of 1139 patients), and 28.1% (80 of 285 patients), respectively. The low-risk groups in the 2 cohorts comprised 15%-17% of all patients. Performance was stable in the 3 sites. CONCLUSIONS Using variables available at the time that blood cultures were performed, the TREAT system successfully stratified patients on the basis of the risk for bacteremia. The system's predictions were stable in 3 locations. The TREAT system can define a low-risk group of inpatients with suspected sepsis for whom blood cultures may not be needed.

[1]  Two rules for early prediction of bacteremia , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  M. Bonten,et al.  treatment of , 2004 .

[3]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[4]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  A Probabilistic Network for Fusion of Data and Knowledge in Clinical Microbiology , 2005 .

[5]  P. Savelkoul,et al.  New developments in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. , 2004, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[6]  C. Woods,et al.  Controlled Clinical Comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the Standard Anaerobic SN Blood Culture Medium , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  A. Macías,et al.  Bacteriemia adquirida en la comunidad: elaboración de un modelo de predicción clínica en pacientes ingresados en un servicio de medicina interna , 2004 .

[8]  F. Jaimes,et al.  Predicting bacteremia at the bedside. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  TREAT: a system for balancing antibiotic treatment against development of drug resistance , 2004 .

[10]  P. Martínez Odriozola,et al.  [Predictive model for community acquired bacteremia in patients from an Internal Medicine Unit]. , 2004, Medicina clinica.

[11]  G. Sanders,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of recombinant human activated protein C and the influence of severity of illness in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. , 2003, Journal of critical care.

[12]  M. Weinstein Blood Culture Contamination: Persisting Problems and Partial Progress , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  Marek J. Druzdzel,et al.  Building Probabilistic Networks: "Where Do the Numbers Come From?" Guest Editors Introduction , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[14]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  A Causal Probabilistic Network for Optimal Treatment of Bacterial Infections , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[15]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Using probabilistic and decision-theoretic methods in treatment and prognosis modeling , 1999, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[16]  J. Eiland,et al.  Blood Cultures Positive for Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Antisepsis, Pseudobacteremia, and Therapy of Patients , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  R. Platt,et al.  Predicting Bacteremia in Patients with Sepsis Syndrome , 1997 .

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  Predicting bacteremia in patients with sepsis syndrome. Academic Medical Center Consortium Sepsis Project Working Group. , 1997, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[19]  L. Leibovici,et al.  Long-term survival following bacteremia or fungemia. , 1995, JAMA.

[20]  J. Mylotte,et al.  Validation of a Bacteremia Prediction Model , 1995, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[21]  H. Halkin,et al.  Inconsistency of a model aimed at predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  David A. Schkade,et al.  WHERE DO THE NUMBERS COME FROM , 1993 .

[23]  W. Knaus,et al.  Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. , 1992, Chest.

[24]  L. Leibovici,et al.  Bacteremia in febrile patients. A clinical model for diagnosis. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  L Goldman,et al.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. , 1991, JAMA.

[26]  E. Cook,et al.  Predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients. A prospectively validated model. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[27]  G A Diamond,et al.  Future imperfect: the limitations of clinical prediction models and the limits of clinical prediction. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.