Structures of MART-126/27-35 Peptide/HLA-A2 complexes reveal a remarkable disconnect between antigen structural homology and T cell recognition.

Small structural changes in peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules often result in large changes in immunogenicity, supporting the notion that T cell receptors are exquisitely sensitive to antigen structure. Yet there are striking examples of TCR recognition of structurally dissimilar ligands. The resulting unpredictability of how T cells will respond to different or modified antigens impacts both our understanding of the physical bases for TCR specificity as well as efforts to engineer peptides for immunomodulation. In cancer immunotherapy, epitopes and variants derived from the MART-1/Melan-A protein are widely used as clinical vaccines. Two overlapping epitopes spanning amino acid residues 26 through 35 are of particular interest: numerous clinical studies have been performed using variants of the MART-1 26-35 decamer, although only the 27-35 nonamer has been found on the surface of targeted melanoma cells. Here, we show that the 26-35 and 27-35 peptides adopt strikingly different conformations when bound to HLA-A2. Nevertheless, clonally distinct MART-1(26/27-35)-reactive T cells show broad cross-reactivity towards these ligands. Simultaneously, however, many of the cross-reactive T cells remain unable to recognize anchor-modified variants with very subtle structural differences. These dichotomous observations challenge our thinking about how structural information on unligated peptide/MHC complexes should be best used when addressing questions of TCR specificity. Our findings also indicate that caution is warranted in the design of immunotherapeutics based on the MART-1 26/27-35 epitopes, as neither cross-reactivity nor selectivity is predictable based on the analysis of the structures alone.

[1]  K. Sakaguchi,et al.  Identification of the immunodominant peptides of the MART-1 human melanoma antigen recognized by the majority of HLA-A2-restricted tumor infiltrating lymphocytes , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  A Sette,et al.  Induction of tumor-reactive CTL from peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of melanoma patients by in vitro stimulation with an immunodominant peptide of the human melanoma antigen MART-1. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[3]  R. Tisch,et al.  Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Anchor Substitutions Alter the Conformation of T Cell Receptor Contacts* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Ulrike Alexiev,et al.  Differential Peptide Dynamics Is Linked to Major Histocompatibility Complex Polymorphism* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  E. Appella,et al.  Structural Evidence of  T Cell Xeno-reactivity in the Absence of Molecular Mimicry , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  M. Probst-Kepper,et al.  Conformational Restraints and Flexibility of 14-Meric Peptides in Complex with HLA-B*35011 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  Robyn L. Stanfield,et al.  An αβ T Cell Receptor Structure at 2.5 Å and Its Orientation in the TCR-MHC Complex , 1996, Science.

[8]  Nicholas A Williamson,et al.  A T cell receptor flattens a bulged antigenic peptide presented by a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[9]  D. Speiser,et al.  High Frequencies of Naive Melan-a/Mart-1–Specific Cd8+ T Cells in a Large Proportion of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen (Hla)-A2 Individuals , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  D. Speiser,et al.  Antigenicity and immunogenicity of Melan‐A/MART‐1 derived peptides as targets for tumor reactive CTL in human melanoma , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[11]  Daniel C. Douek,et al.  T Cell Cross-Reactivity and Conformational Changes during TCR Engagement , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  G. Parmiani,et al.  A superagonist variant of peptide MART1/Melan A27-35 elicits anti-melanoma CD8+ T cells with enhanced functional characteristics: implication for more effective immunotherapy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[13]  Danila Valmori,et al.  Thymic Selection Generates a Large T Cell Pool Recognizing a Self-Peptide in Humans , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  B. Malissen,et al.  How much can a T‐cell antigen receptor adapt to structurally distinct antigenic peptides? , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[15]  D. Wiley,et al.  HLA-A2-peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Wiley,et al.  Peptide recognition by two HLA-A2/Tax11-19-specific T cell clones in relationship to their MHC/peptide/TCR crystal structures. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[17]  K. Echasserieau,et al.  Adoptive Transfer of Tumor-Reactive Melan-A-Specific CTL Clones in Melanoma Patients Is Followed by Increased Frequencies of Additional Melan-A-Specific T Cells1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  Milos V. Novotny,et al.  Increased protein backbone conformational entropy upon hydrophobic ligand binding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  D. Speiser,et al.  Rapid and strong human CD8+ T cell responses to vaccination with peptide, IFA, and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 7909. , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  F. Marincola,et al.  Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[21]  L R Pease,et al.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.

[22]  Daved H. Fremont,et al.  Structural Basis for the Restoration of TCR Recognition of an MHC Allelic Variant by Peptide Secondary Anchor Substitution , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  G. Parmiani,et al.  Suboptimal activation of CD8(+) T cells by melanoma-derived altered peptide ligands: role of Melan-A/MART-1 optimized analogues. , 2003, Cancer research.

[24]  D E McRee,et al.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Flexibility and conformational entropy in protein-protein binding. , 2006, Structure.

[27]  R. Houghten,et al.  Degeneracy of Antigen Recognition as the Molecular Basis for the High Frequency of Naive A2/Melan-A Peptide Multimer+ CD8+ T Cells in Humans , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  Tirso Pons,et al.  Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources , 1998, Bioinform..

[30]  John D. Scott,et al.  Induction of Flexibility through Protein-Protein Interactions* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  M. Karplus,et al.  Crystal Structures of Two Closely Related but Antigenically Distinct HLA-A2/Melanocyte-Melanoma Tumor-Antigen Peptide Complexes1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[32]  J. Frelinger,et al.  The Structural Basis for the Increased Immunogenicity of Two HIV-Reverse Transcriptase Peptide Variant/Class I Major Histocompatibility Complexes* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  Crystal structure of a T cell receptor bound to an allogeneic MHC molecule , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[34]  P. Romero,et al.  Diversity of the fine specificity displayed by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL specific for the immunodominant Melan-A/MART-1 antigenic peptide. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[35]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Cancer Regression in Patients After Transfer of Genetically Engineered Lymphocytes , 2006, Science.

[36]  Partho Ghosh,et al.  The Structure and Stability of an HLA-A*0201/Octameric Tax Peptide Complex with an Empty Conserved Peptide-N-Terminal Binding Site1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[37]  P. Anton van der Merwe,et al.  CDR3 loop flexibility contributes to the degeneracy of TCR recognition , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[38]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  A T cell receptor CDR3beta loop undergoes conformational changes of unprecedented magnitude upon binding to a peptide/MHC class I complex. , 2002, Immunity.

[39]  D. Wiley,et al.  Two human T cell receptors bind in a similar diagonal mode to the HLA-A2/Tax peptide complex using different TCR amino acids. , 1998, Immunity.

[40]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[41]  Partho Ghosh,et al.  Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2 , 1996, Nature.

[42]  A Sette,et al.  Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[43]  D. Wiley,et al.  Importance of peptide amino and carboxyl termini to the stability of MHC class I molecules. , 1994, Science.

[44]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Mass‐spectrometric evaluation of HLA‐A*0201‐associated peptides identifies dominant naturally processed forms of CTL epitopes from MART‐1 and gp100 , 1999 .

[45]  B. Baker,et al.  Increased Immunogenicity of an Anchor-Modified Tumor-Associated Antigen Is Due to the Enhanced Stability of the Peptide/MHC Complex: Implications for Vaccine Design1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  D S Moss,et al.  Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  P. Romero,et al.  Enhanced generation of specific tumor-reactive CTL in vitro by selected Melan-A/MART-1 immunodominant peptide analogues. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[48]  Z Reich,et al.  Thermodynamics of T cell receptor binding to peptide-MHC: evidence for a general mechanism of molecular scanning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  R. Houghten,et al.  Predictable TCR antigen recognition based on peptide scans leads to the identification of agonist ligands with no sequence homology. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[50]  P. Romero,et al.  Melanoma patients respond to a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-defined self-peptide with diverse and nonoverlapping T-cell receptor repertoires. , 2001, Cancer research.

[51]  Brian M Baker,et al.  T cell receptor recognition via cooperative conformational plasticity. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  B M Baker,et al.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. , 1999, Immunity.

[53]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Gene Transfer of Tumor-Reactive TCR Confers Both High Avidity and Tumor Reactivity to Nonreactive Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[54]  Keith Brew,et al.  Increased backbone mobility in beta-barrel enhances entropy gain driving binding of N-TIMP-1 to MMP-3. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  P. Romero,et al.  Cytolytic T lymphocyte recognition of the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted Melan-A/MART-1 antigenic peptide in melanoma. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[56]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[57]  Rosa Sorrentino,et al.  Dual, HLA-B27 Subtype-dependent Conformation of a Self-peptide , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.