Symmetric Decomposition of Asymmetric Games

We introduce new theoretical insights into two-population asymmetric games allowing for an elegant symmetric decomposition into two single population symmetric games. Specifically, we show how an asymmetric bimatrix game (A,B) can be decomposed into its symmetric counterparts by envisioning and investigating the payoff tables (A and B) that constitute the asymmetric game, as two independent, single population, symmetric games. We reveal several surprising formal relationships between an asymmetric two-population game and its symmetric single population counterparts, which facilitate a convenient analysis of the original asymmetric game due to the dimensionality reduction of the decomposition. The main finding reveals that if (x,y) is a Nash equilibrium of an asymmetric game (A,B), this implies that y is a Nash equilibrium of the symmetric counterpart game determined by payoff table A, and x is a Nash equilibrium of the symmetric counterpart game determined by payoff table B. Also the reverse holds and combinations of Nash equilibria of the counterpart games form Nash equilibria of the asymmetric game. We illustrate how these formal relationships aid in identifying and analysing the Nash structure of asymmetric games, by examining the evolutionary dynamics of the simpler counterpart games in several canonical examples.

[1]  R. Selten A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetric animal conflicts. , 1980, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[2]  R. Cressman Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games , 2003 .

[3]  Yi Tao,et al.  The replicator equation and other game dynamics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  G. Tesauro,et al.  Analyzing Complex Strategic Interactions in Multi-Agent Systems , 2002 .

[5]  Alexander Peysakhovich,et al.  Multi-Agent Cooperation and the Emergence of (Natural) Language , 2016, ICLR.

[6]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[7]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language as a Complex Adaptive System , 2000, PPSN.

[8]  Tom Lenaerts,et al.  A selection-mutation model for q-learning in multi-agent systems , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[9]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  On the dynamics of asymmetric games , 1991 .

[10]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[11]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Evolution of cooperation under indirect reciprocity and arbitrary exploration rates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Joel Z. Leibo,et al.  A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriation , 2017, NIPS.

[13]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  Population dynamics from game theory , 1980 .

[14]  Michael P. Wellman Methods for Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis , 2006, AAAI.

[15]  E. Zeeman Dynamics of the evolution of animal conflicts , 1981 .

[16]  K. Tuyls,et al.  How to reach linguistic consensus: a proof of convergence for the naming game. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure , 2016, Nature.

[18]  Luis A. Martinez-Vaquero,et al.  Memory-n strategies of direct reciprocity , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Jorge M. Pacheco,et al.  Evolution of collective action in adaptive social structures , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Karl Tuyls,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Multi-Agent Learning: A Survey , 2015, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[21]  R. Cressman,et al.  Strong stability and evolutionarily stable strategies with two types of players , 1991 .

[22]  Simon Parsons,et al.  What evolutionary game theory tells us about multiagent learning , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[23]  D. Avis,et al.  Enumeration of Nash equilibria for two-player games , 2010 .

[24]  Peter McBurney,et al.  An evolutionary game-theoretic comparison of two double-auction market designs , 2004, AAMAS'04.

[25]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Choosing Samples to Compute Heuristic-Strategy Nash Equilibrium , 2003, AMEC.

[26]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Comparing reactive and memory-one strategies of direct reciprocity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[27]  B. Stengel,et al.  COMPUTING EQUILIBRIA FOR TWO-PERSON GAMES , 1996 .

[28]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[29]  Edgar J. Sánchez Carrera,et al.  On evolutionarily stable strategies and replicator dynamics in asymmetric two-population games , 2011 .

[30]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Statistical Physics of Human Cooperation , 2017, ArXiv.

[31]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  Auctions, Evolution, and Multi-agent Learning , 2007, Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems.

[32]  Michael H. Bowling,et al.  Bayes' Bluff: Opponent Modelling in Poker , 2005, UAI 2005.

[33]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Population Games And Evolutionary Dynamics , 2010, Economic learning and social evolution.

[34]  Alex McAvoy,et al.  Asymmetric Evolutionary Games , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Jan Ramon,et al.  An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of poker strategies , 2009, Entertain. Comput..

[36]  David Silver,et al.  A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning , 2017, NIPS.

[37]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[38]  Bernhard von Stengel,et al.  Chapter 45 Computing equilibria for two-person games , 2002 .

[39]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria , 1987 .

[40]  Carl Veller,et al.  Finite-population evolution with rare mutations in asymmetric games , 2015, J. Econ. Theory.

[41]  D. M. V. Hesteren Evolutionary Game Theory , 2017 .