Conformational search in enkephalin analogues containing a disulfide bond

A systematic Conformational search has been performed for the 14‐membered ring in model compounds for disulfide‐containing enkephalin analogues. The model compounds examined are , and the corresponding compounds with L‐amino acids at the C‐terminus. About 100 starting conformations were generated for each compound with the RNGCFM program and energy minimized with the AMBER program. Between 21 and 38 conformers within 3 kcal/mole of the apparent global minimum were found for each compound. There appeared to be fewer possible conformations of the disulfide‐containing side chain than of the main chain. , whose parent compound is selective for opioid δ receptors, was found to prefer conformers with a positive dihedral angle of the disulfide bond, which is consistent with the previous proposal that δ‐receptor selectivity may be associated with this conformational preference. Additional calculations were performed on the complete structure of (DPDPE) with various possible conformations of the tyrosine and phenylalanine side chains. Conformational free energies and entropies were computed for these conformers from the molecular vibrations obtained from a normal mode analysis. As was found previously, conformers with low energies tended to have lower entropies, which resulted in a narrowing of the free energy differences between conformers. A conformer is identified that has the lowest energy hitherto found for DPDPE. It is suggested that DPDPE may be a useful compound for evaluating conformational search strategies because of its relatively small size and the number of conformers that have already been identified. Conformational energy calculations are also reported for naltrindole using the MM2(87) program. Naltrindole, which incorporates two aromatic 6‐membered rings in a rigid structure, is a highly selective and potent opioid δ‐receptor antagonist and may be an important clue regarding the biologically active conformer of DPDPE. Various conformers of DPDPE have been superimposed quantitatively onto the structure of naltrindole using the SUPER program and those conformers of DPDPE that are the best fit to naltrindole are reported.

[1]  Martin Saunders,et al.  Conformations of cycloheptadecane. A comparison of methods for conformational searching , 1990 .

[2]  M. Froimowitz.  Conformational Properties of 3‐Phenylpiperidine and 3‐Phenylpyrrolidine Opioid Analgesics , 1986 .

[3]  B. Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  The conformational properties of the delta opioid peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin in aqueous solution determined by NMR and energy minimization calculations , 1988 .

[4]  G. Pasternak,et al.  [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE): a δ-selective enkephalin with low affinity for μ1 opiate binding sites , 1986 .

[5]  V. Hruby,et al.  Conformational analysis of enkephalin analogs containing a disulfide bond. Models for delta- and mu-receptor opioid agonists. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[6]  V. Hruby,et al.  Cyclic penicillamine containing enkephalin analogs display profound delta receptor selectivities. , 1983, Life Science.

[7]  V. Hruby,et al.  Characterization of [3H][2-D-penicillamine, 5-D-penicillamine]-enkephalin binding to delta opiate receptors in the rat brain and neuroblastoma--glioma hybrid cell line (NG 108-15). , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L. Toll,et al.  Conformational determinants of high affinity delta receptor binding of opioid peptides. , 1988, Molecular pharmacology.

[9]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Combined use of stereospecific deuteration, NMR, distance geometry, and energy minimization for the conformational analysis of the highly .delta. opioid receptor selective peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin , 1990 .

[10]  H. E. Hallam,et al.  Conformational isomerism of the amide group - a review of the IR and NMR spectroscopic evidence , 1970 .

[11]  Conformation of cyclic analogs of enkephalin. II. Analogs containing a cystine bridge , 1984, Biopolymers.

[12]  J. Richardson,et al.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. , 1981, Advances in protein chemistry.

[13]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Multiple opioid receptors criteria for identification and classification , 1984 .

[14]  H. Akil,et al.  Role of steric interactions in the delta opioid receptor selectivity of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[15]  V. Hruby,et al.  Conformationally constrained cyclic enkephalin analogs with pronounced delta opioid receptor agonist selectivity. , 1983, Life sciences.

[16]  Y. Shimohigashi,et al.  ▽ E Phe4‐enkephalin analogs Delta receptors in rat brain are different from those in mouse vas deferens , 1987 .

[17]  K. Bogeso,et al.  Conformational analysis and structural comparisons of (1R,3S)-(+)- and (1S,3R)-(-)-tefludazine, (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-octoclothepin, and (+)-dexclamol in relation to dopamine receptor antagonism and amine-uptake inhibition. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  AMBER: Assisted model building with energy refinement. A general program for modeling molecules and their interactions , 1981 .

[19]  H. Mosberg,et al.  1H n.m.r. investigation of conformational features of cyclic enkephalinamide analogs. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[20]  T F Burks,et al.  Bis-penicillamine enkephalins possess highly improved specificity toward delta opioid receptors. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  V. Hruby,et al.  [D-Pen2, L-Cys5]enkephalinamide and[D-Pen2, D-Cys5] enkephalinamide, conformationally constrained cyclic enkephalinamide analogs with delta receptor specificity. , 1982, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[22]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[23]  M. Froimowitz,et al.  Comparison of semiempirical classical and semiempirical quantum mechanical calculations on acetylcholine. , 1972, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  M. Froimowitz,et al.  Geometrical correspondence between phenazocine and the enkephalins. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  G. Nikiforovich,et al.  A model for the δ‐receptor‐bound conformation of enkephalin , 1988 .

[26]  P. Portoghese,et al.  Application of the message-address concept in the design of highly potent and selective non-peptide delta opioid receptor antagonists. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Fluorescence study on the conformation of a cyclic enkephalin analog in aqueous solution. , 1983, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[28]  David Hall,et al.  An appraisal of molecular force fields for the representation of polypeptides , 1984 .

[29]  P. Kollman,et al.  An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids , 1986, Journal of computational chemistry.